InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 42
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/16/2006

Re: lesnshawn post# 130300

Tuesday, 11/14/2006 11:11:12 AM

Tuesday, November 14, 2006 11:11:12 AM

Post# of 169278
Proof can often be found from what was written by the Company and what wasn't written. None of us should be seeking the same level of proof that a jury would want for a criminal conviction of fraud, but the proof that a reasonable investor would seek to determine if he should make an investment. I think that any reasonable person would find that the Company's 10K filings are not what one would expect from a company with such a purported large net worth. Also, the SEC has simply asked for documentation to support CSHD's 10K filings - that they owned the Bonds. This should be very straight forward - they produce the evidence of their ownership - and they have had over a mnonth to complete this. Any reasonable investor would draw the conclusion that CSHD doesn't have such documentation and therefore PROBABLY doesn't own the bonds. Also, it is interesting that the controlling stockholders replaced Rufus - that would seem to indicate that they also have no confidence in his public representations. If the information in the 10K was accurate, CSHD would have no problem in obtaining additional cash so that they had adequate lawyers and accountants to have averted this situation.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.