Wednesday, March 20, 2019 11:19:07 AM
They said they will revisit the decision in the future "when it makes sense".
With the costs of having audited financial statements ranging from $20,000 to $50,000, this seems to make a lot of sense. This would be closer to the 50k mark, as they are an umbrella company, who owns other companies, more complex.
It might make the stock price rise temporarily, but it will not add to the companies profits... the actual bottom line. What was their profit in the last annual statement? What would the profit have been minus another 50k?
Answer these questions and you will see the reasoning behind dropping their reporting requirements.
I dont remember if this was in an email or in the newsletter.
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM