InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 194
Posts 18521
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/21/2010

Re: shotsky post# 109189

Wednesday, 03/20/2019 11:04:54 AM

Wednesday, March 20, 2019 11:04:54 AM

Post# of 142845
The loan from Matt Dwyer to $TGGI to acquire $IGPK is a big deal in that the cash didn't come from then-current $TGGI shareholders. In this sense $TGGI shareholders received a free lunch at someone else's (money, time, and expertise) expense.

He bought the empty shell of IGPK out of his own pocket last year, and gave himself (TGGI) the 540M shares.


The expectation was / is?? that the CEO should self-fund the company, return 530 million of his own shares, and be called a scammer despite no convictions and FINRA proving on multiple occasions that that he has a clean record.





Here its Matt Dwyer, but its the same on many other OTC stocks. Not saying *some* aren't criminals, but there should be a higher standard of proof to justify the conspiracy theory posts.

The paradox of iHub: buy high, sell low