InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 1527
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/15/2011

Re: None

Friday, 02/22/2019 2:26:23 AM

Friday, February 22, 2019 2:26:23 AM

Post# of 29968
Dear RCMP - IMET. MSX is 100% safe. Charges were made in Chile that it was MWR (TSX-OSC) who BCSC sanctioned 2017 -2018 to date, via its executive

It is important to inform the public that MSX regulators are defending in Chile a 2016-2019 "secret case paid by PUBLIC FUNDS". Both by Barrick and its protectors MSX regulators, "without publishing MATERIAL FACTS".

It is a LEGAL OBLIGATION in Canada for companies spending PUBLIC FUNDS to defend legal actions abroad, to PUBLISH THEIR MATERIAL FACTS. As MSX regulators protect ABX - TSX - OSC from publishing and v. MSX. MSX local regulators filed their fight in Chile is v. MWR (TSX-OSC) 2017 and that some criminal stole the MWR 2017 published articles, how sad YOUR HONOUR ... MSX regulators have given themselves license to LIE to both Courts in Canada and Chile v. MSX and me?

How abusive they have become to AVOID BEING JAILED eh?
SIMPLE or EXOTICALLY COMPLICATED REGULATORS? Trying to absolve TSX OSC in Chile 2019 v. MSX as if it was MWR 2019? ARE YOU FOR REAL?

Or just PATHETICALLY IGNORANT CRIMINAL BULLIES?

A simple miner in non paper shuffling world of rocks and minerals, is the one that has and identifies targets of interest that are clear winners at plain sight. My Amarillos concessions of 1996, MINA PASCUA itself, may be seen from satellites and from the Moon. With an amateur telescope.

a BOGUS MINER like clients of the exchanges involved, many and Barrick; are "exoticly complicated miners"... looking for large low grade Gold deposits when a few high grade a plenty available to us for decades; will do. Nope they preferred to kill all small and medium miners. All ex V S E involved directly with MSX regulators that again DID NOT REGULATE. When caught like CMN just changed names, (TSE too) shredded files, changed cosmetic rules, WE ARE BORN A NEW problems solve. DENIAL DENIAL DENIAL 1998-2019.

Did it help? Did it? who where helped, who won and who lost and why?

Won: THE SAME GANG, regulators and banks that looked the other side + ABX + SLW + + + everyone that touched PASCUA asset or LAMA scam.

Lost: Canada, financial markets, the public, MWR + MSX + my investors, family, friends, 1000s of people hundreds of mining families, so rats may be rich and also have a home in Valparaiso Chile to enjoy the thievery.

2006-2009 MX regulators again went after one of my clients, INFINEX VENTURES INC and it was fought, subdued, same vigilantes descended as "saviours to poor innocent investors that dared to challenge Barrick and its ownership - as MSX regulators lied under oath = via MINERA NEVADA.

Barrick lied 2019 the same line that MSX regulators used against MSX that TESOROS was owned by CMN in Canada and owned by MINERA NEVADA in Chile? Can they not think straight or tell a straight LIE? so MSX regulators charged MWR 2017 because MINERA NEVADA (CMN - COMPANIA MINERA NEVADA) owns TESOROS? really? CMN and MINERA NEVADA do not exist. That, is a REAL FICTION OF THEIR IMAGINATION, not my denied INTERNATIONAL SUBPOENA served by the Vancouver sheriff to MSX liar regulator November 10, 2017.

Why did he carry out the FARCE of 2018 Hearing to date, if he did not disclose the facts and MADE THEM UP? Why defend as MWR v local regulators? to get TEX of the hook too? or to avoid MSX in Chile? How shallow. They retorted the demand, going ALL OUT + ALL IN against 719-2011 and? MUM when we punch their teeth out in Court? silent troops?

Neither CMN or MINERA NEVADA are companies or business = ALL FICTION. The crimes of CMN S.A span 1978-2019. The crimes of CMN LIMITADA, span 2002-2006 buys a crime and sells TESOROS in crime to PASCUA LAMA PROTOCOL in violation of Injunction to CMN SpA to trade at NYSE + TSX to date.

CMN SpA sues the Judge that ordered TESOROS to die and in its place mi AMARILLOS concessions to be reborn, Civl 2007 and Criminally 2010. They did not have title. No valid ownership of TESOROS. They had 4 1997 contracts in fraus of my 1996 ownership, to favor TESOROS 1997 laid 4 days before THE CRIME.

CMN SpA 2017 was MSX regulators at page one of their reply to the demand. Revealing IT HURTS to be them. Arrogantly stated that IT is a SUPREME CORPORATION OF GOODNESS & RICHES owning TESOROS and PASCUA FOREVER as they are a 1983-2019 flamboyant prestigious miner. DIFFERENT TO BARRICK.
CMN is not BARRICK and plaintiff should be tossed out of tribunals as MSX regulators can not be touched by chilean judges. CMN is CMN. We won all cases against Plaintiff and CMN owns TESOROS since day one.

BARRICK? is another corporation with other individuals your honor, rich investors, MOTHER THERESA of mining companies BUT NOT CMN. That... NOT.

Really? FALSE STATEMENTS LIARS? 4 contracts 1997 signed off the same day reveal that my client president of COMPANIA MINERA BARRICK CHILE LTDA signed off with my best LEGAL ENEMY in mining 1996; with that company and as PRESIDENT OF CMN S.A. the same day, to defraud MY AGENT since 1996 with my LIVE RIGHTS AT HAND. Promising to fully constitute my property in one of those contracts, my 1996 DEMAND TO BARRICK or my AGENT would not sign, those were my instructions.

The did that they would fully constitute AMARILLOS SUR and NORTE exists, what does not exist, is FULFILLMENT OF the 1997 CONTRACTS over my 1996 legal mining rights. CMN admitted to be the same company 1983-2019.

Really? guess what?. Your Honor, get these contracts read aloud by both MSX regulators and Barrick - YES - BARRICK that is CMN in Chile.

Get it?

"too many notes" (ABX victories) as MOZART would hear? AMADEUS the movie.
Both parties are defending MUMBO JUMBO. And we are quite happy to see if MSX shareholders will be HONEST, they replied the demand that THE MWR POST 2017 v. MSX REGULATORS was "removed from Internet"... truly A LIE.

MWR - TSX - OSC never existed 2017 or as lied in their reply last week, intercepted by our reply this week. MSX the company was the one issuing the statement, but MSX the company was left out by MSX regulators in their Chile defense submission. They fought v. MWR (TSX-OSC) 2017 in Courts of Chile. And Internet erased the MWR 2017 POSTS? or they LIED?

You be the Judge... these crooks are dissolving and crumbling as we start sounding the trumpets of justice and presenting EVIDENCE they denied to MSX and me as VALID or RELEVANT to their hearing.

All transmissions were copied to live trial and now they have to ABSOLVE and RESOLVE. FACE OFF and SING THE TRUTH - OR BE JAILED type of thing.

Interesting that Mr. T is an appointed Judge by the Judicial powers of Chile that clearly at my instructions DENIED that MSX was involved in the OVER REACHED ENFORCING executed by MSX regulators v. MSX to steal and conceal evidence against - - passing the same to - - Barrick in Canada.

That is RICO ACT racketeering. Avoidance of informing Canada and ZEALOT PROTECTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING by Barrick, allowed Barrick to dissipate all billions to TRIZEC-HAN REAL STATE EMPIRE and ABX was depleted never investing in Chile but USD1.05 as ABX - TSX - OSC and ABX - NYSE - SEC.

FIRST TIMERS the lie to commit LARCENY by MSX regulators since V S E that has crossed two decades, two centuries and two millennia. Pascua theft.

They had the AUDACITY to LIE in Chilean Court that MSX regulators had FOR THE FIRST TIME become acquainted with THE (pseudo) FACT that BARRICK had a PROBLEM with me or PASCUA assets in Chile. Really? VIRGIN EARS?

What about the INFINEX fight brought to you by SLIMY & SLIMIER?

what about the SLW and SKUNK 2009-2019? Temporary CONVENIENT AMNESIA?

In Court is where decisions are taken. Not by SLIMY & SILMIER + MSX regulators in BC, over mining matters in Chile, where Chilean Judges DO HAVE JURISDICTION. Fools. SAN JOSE INC used the same arguments at the 18th Civil Court of Santiago and WERE DENIED TO REMOVE MY JUDGES.

You think Barrick and MSX regulators will? AFTER THEY SHOW the same JUDGES the TESOROS titles of MINERA NEVADA or CMN the fantasy names... perhaps... or will they? mmmm ... tick tick tick tick

Why would MSX liar regulators be FIGHTING v. MWR (TSX 0 OSC) in Chile and LOST THEIR EVIDENCE in Chile and MY EVIDENCE in Canada? Silly goofs?

Enjoy your crimes while they last.

**** Attn MSX shareholders: In 2 minutes I found THE LOST EVIDENCE and filed it today v. MSX regulators. It WILL BE PART OF THE MOVIE. ****

Promised.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.