InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 737
Posts 61294
Boards Moderated 11
Alias Born 10/05/2009

Re: drugmanrx post# 56314

Sunday, 01/20/2019 12:59:01 PM

Sunday, January 20, 2019 12:59:01 PM

Post# of 79132
If the preferred shares issue, was the real reason,

why did the ex-director(s) try to assassinate(?) IFUS or make it surrender to a takeover while the cloning(?) IFUS attempt was underway, with the what seems to be an obvious(?) Absorbezz LLC clone, and while taking business, customers and revenue and profits away from IFUS (according to the public records of the IFUS counter suit),

why was there no mention of this in the court till 3+ years later in a second suit that tried to claim the IFUS CEO, Walther, was guilty of a federal RICO racketeering act violation?

A RICO claim the judge ultimately threw out.

If Adelstein was convinced that Walther was guilty of a RICO violation why didn't Adelstein also sue Scivoletto,

(his partner in the Absrobezz LLC clone of IFUS(?) at the time he sued Walther in the federal Rico case 3 years after he called the loan)

since Scivoletto also had to vote to create and issue the shares to himself, 3+ years earlier?

Why was there no mention of the preferred shares till 3+ years later, and why were we told from 2013 on, that it was "just a simple loan default case" at the state level? Why did a state loan default case drag out for 5 years and why did the Ex-es never let it go to trial?

What did they have to loose if they let it go trial? Hmm


All of my posts are strictly opinions and should not be considered to be facts, or investment advise. They are for entertainment purposes only.