InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 309
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/09/2018

Re: jmf4 post# 8781

Thursday, 12/20/2018 4:35:17 PM

Thursday, December 20, 2018 4:35:17 PM

Post# of 10344
A couple of comments - no yelling.

A 510(K) premarket clearance for this class of device is not so difficult to obtain. It would have been surprising if ARTH had not able to obtain it. Same for CE mark. That is not to imply that obtaining the clearance (not an approval per se, which is much more difficult to obtain)isn't noteworthy. It's simply one more step on a long road. It's simply important to keep things in perspective and to have reasonable expectations.

ANY increase in the stock price for a pre-revenue company in this market is nothing to sneeze at. ARTH has supporters.

The "rubber will meet the road" when the AC5 topical product produces unit sales and revenues. ROTH capital is assuming a royalty model in its report, one that assumes that another company will make & sell the device and that ARTH will obtain a royalty stream. That is a 'best guess' as no deal has yet been signed. Wound care is a crowded and price senitive feld, so success woon't be easy regardless of the technology in the device. Let's see the product sales revenues AND understand how much profit (& cash) these will contribute to ARTH. ARTH is counting on these profits to fund future products developments.