I can almost guarantee the principal of nanosux was given a wells notice years ago. Unfortunately, the SEC does not publish those publicly to protect the company being investigated from more stock manipulations or runs on their stock if it was known of an investigation. As well as to give the SEC time and less interference during an investigation. Nor is there any laws that force the company to publish wells notices either. A scam will post them AFTER the SEC puts it out that the company is being sued. As if to seem like the company actually cared about shareholders.
Look up nanosux in the past SEC filings and in 2012 there were numerous 'letters of correspondence' between the SEC and nanosux. Also, coincidentally the principal was forming nanosux gaming and royal capital in that time frame.
When you see those in the filings (always search 'all filings') it is almost 100% that the SEC has been already looking at the company and feels it has enough to investigate.
In nanosux's case, I don't think the public damage has been great enough with enough money for the SEC to make it worthwhile to litigate against nanosux. The principal is a too small time punk who has stayed out of the greater market awareness.
You would think when a pink company files a form 14 to deregister itself from the SEC within weeks of getting letters from the SEC that this would be an automatic red flagged event. Nanosux and the principal has done nothing for 7 years but hide from shareholders and the SEC, and in the principals case the courts and foreclosure proceedings. The principals time will come soon.
Just wish the two nanosux stocks would be delisted or shut down.
Nanosux is rinky dink criminal enterprise so inconsequential it can barely keep a shitty phone app in operation.
Just one of those scams that takes forever to be erased from the public markets, or otc listing service in nanosux's case.
