InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2018

Re: None

Tuesday, 12/11/2018 7:23:51 PM

Tuesday, December 11, 2018 7:23:51 PM

Post# of 52207
Just because Mitch was involved with NF and the fact that NF was successful doesn't default MP to be successful. In fact Mitch has been involved with more unsuccessful projects than successful. The window of opportunity for MP has expired. I believe that he is still pursuing the MP challenge only to give himself industry leverage his existing industry base. There is a good chance that he knows that the future is at home on the couch in front of out ultra high def screens. This last summer there were one or two maybe more direct from production to NF distribution. But changes in the industry would have to shift because for awards eligibility the movie has to release to theaters. The theater experience is rather dated and more restrictive than folks admit. Think of elderly, disabled and limited individuals that are being excluded from the potential available audience. Mitch if anything is simply using the added advantage of industry influence from MP to empower his opportunity to usher NF forward. All his conference appearances list him under NF, not MP. One thing his last interview lacks is any proper recognition for HMNY all he makes clear is that they are trying to lean on HMNY less. What reason would people have to continue to invest in HMNY with Mitch making those statements. He is clearly going to separate from HMNY leaving H&M with what $100,000 annual income from consulting? We went from a 2 headed proxy between MP and H&M in the beginning to a three headed proxy. There are to many cooks in the kitchen and they are using up the opportunity window fighting rather than producing. I feel that Mitch has alterior motives and he has a singular true loyalty to NF. He is involved only to pursue reenegizing his starving debt ridden baby NF.

Don't listen to me.
I'm not rich.
I'm wrong a lot of the time.
I don't even trust myself.