InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 1690
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: bulldzr post# 170792

Saturday, 11/04/2006 9:07:12 AM

Saturday, November 04, 2006 9:07:12 AM

Post# of 433021
Bulldozer.

That's the one thing I liked about the CC:

"In the New York case we have already indicated to the court that some Samsung’s more egregious positions may be sanctiona(ble)(sic)."

I'm sure Merritt realizes that Nokia and Samsung are leading the parade, trying to stamp-out royalties for the good of humanity. And, if tough action isn't taken, this could go on indefinately.

When he says "we have already indicated to the court", I take it that IDCC has already filed motions for sanctions.

And when he says "more egregious positions", it's apparent that Samsung has served-up more than one legal tidbit for IDCC's lawyers to chew on.

Mschere's post about Samsung's sanction in Canada, when added to their price-fixing conviction in the U.S., and the related conviction of certain Samsungs executives, tells me there's light at the end of the tunnel.

Too bad the analysts didn't pursue the sanction comments more thoroughly.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News