InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 167
Posts 20654
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/09/2000

Re: None

Tuesday, 10/23/2018 10:35:31 PM

Tuesday, October 23, 2018 10:35:31 PM

Post# of 679
So is this the part where they say politician cant waive compliance with legal conditions - but what does the representatives signature represent? Isn't their signature binding for the entity they are representing?

104. The fact that CMK sought political intervention to try to speed things up is understandable. However, the Tribunal’s focus is on the legal requirements not the politics of the situation. By its
express terms, SPL 256 required CMK to conduct a “mine feasibility report” and an
“Environmental Impact Assessment Study” before applying for a mining licence. These
conditions were imposed on SPL 256 by authority of s. 17 of the Mining Act and s. 4(2) of the
Environmental Impact (Assessment and Audit) Regulations.
105. No amount of frustration with the bureaucracy excused CMK from non-performance of these legal conditions, nor could non-performance be waived by the politicians.

Check out my PWCRF custom jacket -- Ok time to go to the moon!! :-)