Any new lien(s) may also be "New" MyECheck. MEC is not new "MyECheck" in California. The new "MyECheck" is only recently of California legal standing, but not the original Company of that name. For that new Company, there are rules about what gets paid Franchise Tax Board, when the payments are due, and who has to pay. That is about that new Company. Source of the "New" Tax liens, regarding MyECheck, is not reported in any IHUB post. Those are more likely incurred by the brand new Company, Not the MEC Company.
In California, long-standing rules are nevertheless applicable for the new "MyECheck" company, which is different from MEC, and not MEC. That company is further likely subject to Lanham Act federal and state fines and penalties at any rate. That too is about California defendant, in Company lawsuit, not about MEC. That Defendant's new company will likely owe a bundle, just starting up(?)!
The new "MYEcheck" is so far only famous for creating likely unusual or fraudulent start-up costs!
Easily that can be shown a jury.
