InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1018
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/27/2016

Re: Paullee post# 18569

Wednesday, 09/05/2018 9:27:56 AM

Wednesday, September 05, 2018 9:27:56 AM

Post# of 18730
Judge Freeman had to leave it in because it has been proven that Finjan founder, Shlomo Touboul, lied before PTAB in order to have the '494 issued and Finjan's attorney, James Hannah, also lied before PTAB. I love the explanation:

"arguments made by attorneys during the trial-like patent proceeding involved different interpretations of evidence, and that advocacy shouldn’t be viewed as an attempt to defraud"

Basically... attorneys are allowed to lie before PTAB and say things that wouldn't be allowed in a "real" court. We simply call that "advocacy".

Too danged funny!

I have said it often... Finjan will rue the day they sued Cisco. Just wait until the counter-claim is decided for Finjan's failure to honor a Non-disclosure Agreement (NDA) with Cisco.

By the way.... Did you notice Judge Freeman stated it was a "average, garden variety $10 million case". I know most think it was much higher, but it isn't. None of their remaining cases are worth much since the appellate court shot down their method of computing royalties at $8.50/user. That is why Symantec became $65M right after they guided $500M and there is nobody left worth much more than $10M.

Their whole business plan now is to do nothing and collect salaries for years until the money dries up. They shut down CybeRisk and Finjan Mobile is a flop. They'll give away a small license once a quarter to maintain the illusion.