NGL Energy Partners LP (NGL)

[jugs]

My ongoing romance with "TheMac"---one of the two leading naysayers at Seeking Alpha---continues. I just found his further engaging in stupid frivolity accusing me of smoking a strange substance (ggg) and for that reason aligning with NGL. Rhetoric and underlying motivations for such aside, I put together a short piece aiming to weaken his credibility as I do not respect his actions.

I'm on the only believable ground any investor can claim as his turf---profits. Yet he is always there to impugn whereas I toy with the likes (and dislikes---lol) of him and his cadre. I am a pussycat knowing full well that I'm destroying his negative posturing. And I'm having fun.

Following is my latest chapter in the saga:


To:

The Mac:

If doing crack means coming up with a gain sitting there right this moment to the tune of $122,225--- I'd be smoking or however it's managed 24/7. I'm afraid I don't know about it.

Then again, I'm not grousing because of mismanaging my stock- invested funds or even bad luck.

As they say---different smokes for different blokes. Or tokes, cokes, and---you guessed it!---

HOAX!!!

Credibility is shot in the jugular when the angry soul within is revealed to be a former investor held captive due to an unfortunate come-about. It happens to me , too, now and then. I move on without trying to poison the surrounding waters for others.

Say what you will about NGL guidance in the past, it may have little bearing on the present save for opening opportunity---TODAY. Also, not all investors depend upon corporate guidance. I never do, as my Investor Relations background (professionally speaking) taught me well that the IR guy's first responsibility is that of bringing the investing community to think well of the company in focus. When reading guidance, it must be interpreted as "doctored the truth" so as to induce readership to discount relevance of the negatives, of which there will always be some.

I hurt for anybody with vengeance on his mind. But had I been available for beatings coming from those negatively predisposed, I'd not be sitting on the bundle I've earned by designing my own DD plan.

I do wish you'd reconsider your attitudinal stance with respect to NGL. SA readership may be influenced by your opinions more than anybody else's.

The primary goal of any investor is that of making money, to quote Kevin O'Leary and countless legions before him. After that may come a range of different motivators but increasing wealth will always precede all others. SA readers complain a lot and almost never will you run across a positive stance such as our own srains, pete807, & harkmi put forth. Yet I am saddened by the disproportionate display of angst versus honest well-wishing so readily apparent on the SA pages pretending to be useful excursions into the lands of Due Diligence.


Lifting a finger to retaliate is not the same thing as defending. I feel no need to defend NGL as our financial success speaks volumes of and by itself. Yet there are literally millions of investors who, like ourselves, might avail themselves of this fantastic opportunity to increase personal wealth--- if only they could move with greater independence, courage and lustful exuberance.

It's known as "passion."

Onward, Soldiers!