InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 729
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/06/2014

Re: Tom Swift post# 27553

Friday, 08/03/2018 3:23:34 PM

Friday, August 03, 2018 3:23:34 PM

Post# of 28183
'fraid you got that one wrong, Tom.

When Cyclone hired Ohio State University to make the WHE engine work, the first thing they did wasn't to recommend a bearing testing machine.

The first thing they did was throw away the Harry Schoell "spider bearing".

Then they threw away the Harry Schoell valve system.

Then they threw away half the cylinders.

That's when they predicted the new engine would survive the 200 hour run test.

Very shortly after that prediction they then concluded the water-lubricated bearings were a "critical" issue and recommended building a bearing test machine and starting experiments since they could find no bearing material that would survive in a Cyclone engine. That was after 10 years of Cyclone not being able to find any bearing that would survive in a Cyclone engine.

At that point Cyclone stopped paying OSU, didn't follow the recommendation to build a bearing test machine, then came out with the Marks 1, 3 and 10 designs that went back to 6 cylinders and the "spider bearing".

Harry Schoell is incapable of learning. He will just keep on tinkering like he always has, never making any progress, never intending to make any progress, but doing it all on other people's money.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.