Home > Boards > iHub Talk > Other > The Closet (FUNG)

fun old days with Lindabruzzone….

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
fung_derf Member Profile
Member Level 
Followed By 196
Posts 105,521
Boards Moderated 17
Alias Born 08/30/01
160x600 placeholder
fung_derf Member Level  Thursday, 07/26/18 03:34:39 PM
Re: None
Post # of 531 
fun old days with Lindabruzzone….

Quote:
To: scion who wrote (5363) 11/24/2003 3:32:56 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell Read Replies (2) of 12254


Re: 11/17-24/03 - [PCBM] Linda Bruzzone, Private Investigator, Launches Investigation of Owners and Posters on Message Boards

Posted by: janice shell
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 17827 Date:11/17/2003 5:44:55 PM
Post #of 18584

Yes, Linda, it is.

Isn't it time people grew up and acted like adults?

You should have thought about that before you pranced onto the RB PCBM thread accusing everyone critical of the company of stock manipulation, which is a crime.

No "private" information about you was posted. All of it came from public sources, so stop whining about it.

You wonder why people were critical of you? Well, you sided with PCBM's most notorious touts, including the obscene and insane Surfit. And then you made up silly and increasingly embellished stories about people stalking you.

So let it be a lesson, Linda: accuse people of crimes they didn't commit, and they'll get pretty pissed off. And they'll try to find out everything they can about you. Don't forget: YOU appeared on the PCBM board soliciting "information" about the identities of "bashers". What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

As it happens, you came up against some people who're better at this detective stuff than you are.

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: lindabruzzone
In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 17829 Date:11/17/2003 7:18:06 PM
Post #of 18584

So, Janice, you speak for everyone? Seems that is what started this when someone told me I needed to speak to Fung Derf of Fidelity and all of a sudden, you took that personally and began attacking. I believe that is shareholder manipulation, Janice.

Why did you choose to get involved, rather than merely letting Fung Derf handle his own matters. Now, why would it bother YOU that someone wished to speak to Fung Derf...do you control everyone's conversations? So, you do backgrounds on people who ask to speak to someone else? What is your motive?

Again, now you're speaking for Huckleberry...does Huckleberry have a voice?

You are just about in the middle of everything, aren't you Janice?

I guess you feel you are entitled to invade others' privacy when they wish to speak to people. I guess you feel you are entitled to harass them because they wish to speak to someone.

I believe what you did, coupled with your comments on the CYPT board, were stockholder manipulation. I believe what you have done is illegal, Janice.

So, now you are teaching people lessons or people will get "pissed off," huh? Just how do they get "pissed off" Janice? Do they post private fact in public forum? Do they harass people at their homes? Do they go after their families, Janice?

Speaking of geese and detectives, let's see the license or the name of the boss.

Happy days ahead, Janice...


investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: fung_derf
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 17873 Date:11/17/2003 10:19:39 PM
Post #of 18584

Ahhhh linda, but you see, you blew it. You continually took information out of context to create an insinuation, and at the very least my dear, that is poor form. You see, nobody actually said that I was with Fidelity, however, you decided to continue with this false line of reasoning. I can only assume you were trying to harrass and cause shareholder manipulation in its' worst form! Let's look at what was actually said to you.....

By: guru11
07 Nov 2003, 11:34 AM EST
Msg. 1037729 of 1042251
Jump to msg. #
And Linda..

The moderator FUNG DERF, has somehow been associated with
Fidelity in Texas, I bet your investigation skills may dig up something for us, the bewildered bunch! imo

Thanks..

Now, what does associated mean? I park cars? I deliver their mail? OR perhaps I am a customer? Or perhaps, none of the above.

One entry found for associate.


Main Entry: 1as·so·ci·ate
Pronunciation: &-'sO-shE-"At, -sE-
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): -at·ed; -at·ing
Etymology: Middle English associat associated, from Latin associatus, past participle of associare to unite, from ad- + sociare to join, from socius companion -- more at SOCIAL
Date: 14th century
transitive senses
1 : to join as a partner, friend, or companion
2 obsolete : to keep company with : ATTEND
3 : to join or connect together : COMBINE
4 : to bring together or into relationship in any of various intangible ways (as in memory or imagination)
intransitive senses
1 : to come or be together as partners, friends, or companions
2 : to combine or join with other parts : UNITE
synonym see JOIN


Now, I have told you numerous times that I am in no way "WITH" Fidelity, however, you choose to consider to attack, accuse and work towards shareholder manipulation!
BTW, one more thing.....If you choose linda as your alias, then it no longer stands as just your real name, but also as your alias. Therefore, using it to address you is, in fact, proper internet protocol.
Now, I have one more request of you, quit pestering me, and using my alias in a negative light. TIA.


Derf

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: lindabruzzone
In reply to: fung_derf who wrote msg# 17910 Date:11/18/2003 4:21:57 PM
Post #of 18584

Dear Mr./Ms.Derf....

Thank you very much for your response. However, I was looking for an individual named Fung Derf WITH Fidelity...now, if you are NOT this person, then, I have no idea what your issue is. If you are this person, then why would you be upset that someone wished to speak with you for an unknown reason? I don't understand why someone would be so defensive over this, especially since you state you are not Fung Derf with Fidelity.

My only suggestion is that you speak with your associate, Janice Shell, and others, regarding this matter as she and they took it so very defensively that she and they felt they needed to background me and my entire family and publicly display that information.

She stated, right on this board, last night, that you were the reason she and others took this action.

Now, you wrote: "Now, I have told you numerous times that I am in no way "WITH" Fidelity, however, you choose to consider to attack, accuse and work towards shareholder manipulation!"

I am confused, are you saying that you have commited shareholder manipulation (intimidation) and you are concerned I am accusing YOU of this? Why would you feel that I have "attacked you?" Can you cite the specific posts that indicate you have been attacked in any way? I haven't accused you of anything. It has been quite the contrary.

Further you wrote:

"BTW, one more thing.....If you choose linda as your alias, then it no longer stands as just your real name, but also as your alias. Therefore, using it to address you is, in fact, proper internet protocol. Now, I have one more request of you, quit pestering me, and using my alias in a negative light. TIA."

You are mistaken in this. I have chosen Lindabruzzone. I use my real name on the internet as I have stated and as you clearly know and others clearly knew, therefore, using that name to "background me" and my family. This is, again, due notice that it is my REAL name.

Clearly, there is concern about defamation and the use of real names and aliases and I am extremely pleased individuals are now getting caught up on caselaw regarding cyber defamation. And clearly, there is concern there may be shareholder manipulation through intimidation (now you're getting it) and harrassment techniques to include posting of personal fact upon public bulletin boards and a continuing pattern of that harassment.

Finally, to your last sentence...are you the only person who has the alias or the name fung derf and why would you feel it would be used in a negative light if one were to say that "Fung derf is associated with Fidelity." or if one were to say, "Fung derf is with Fidelity?" This is truly confusing.

I can only hope you don't get as upset and irate with your postman!

Thank you for your attention in this matter.

I remain,

Linda Bruzzone


investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: janice shell
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 17952 Date:11/18/2003 4:41:13 PM
Post #of 18584

I mean this in the nicest possible way, Linda, but you're thick as a plank.

However, I was looking for an individual named Fung Derf WITH Fidelity...now, if you are NOT this person, then, I have no idea what your issue is. If you are this person, then why would you be upset that someone wished to speak with you for an unknown reason? I don't understand why someone would be so defensive over this, especially since you state you are not Fung Derf with Fidelity.

btw, do you have any idea how irritating you are?

=====


Posted by: lindabruzzone
In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 17970 Date:11/18/2003 4:52:21 PM
Post #of 18584

Dear Ms. Shell,

Thank you very much for your clearly intended, nice way of insulting an individual.

I am very sorry you feel irritated when confronted on your actions of harassment and intimidation of others.

I realize you most likely felt irritated when you were sued numerous times before for the same exact actions and in fact, you are probably feeling the same irration with your current lawsuit, which AGAIN addresses the SAME pattern of actions.

One would think, by now, that one would consider ceasing actions of harassment and intimidation. However, it is clear that is something you choose not to do.

I do appreciate and thank you for your reasoning and admission of the harassment and intimidation.

I do have one question, however. Why do you feel such a compelling need to answer for everyone? In the beginning, you stated you harassed and intimidated because you didn't like people to ask questions about others (thus the reason you backgrounded me and put private fact into a public forum.)

You've answered for Huckleberry and AGAIN for Mr./Ms. Derf...why would you feel a need to speak for them? And why would you feel a need to harass and intimidate others especially when you are currently being sued for the same behavior.

Finally, you obviously feel in competition with me, stating you were a better investigator than I am. How many investigations have you REALLY done? Where and for whom? To be honest, I feel you are simply embellishing and continuing the pattern of insulting, harassing and intimidating individuals.

As well, I don't believe you have done any "scambusting" whatsoever and are even involved in that. I do believe you are engaged in harassing and intimidating others, however. I'd love to hear of the "scam busts" if they truly exist.

Please think about it and answer the specific questions.

Have a nice evening,

Linda Bruzzone

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: janice shell
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 17984 Date:11/18/2003 6:05:46 PM
Post #of 18584

Sheesh.

I realize you most likely felt irritated when you were sued numerous times before for the same exact actions...

Yes, I was indeed irritated. But it was no biggie. Both of the companies in question were outrageous scams, and have since been dealt with by the SEC. Currently, people associated with both are facing criminal prosecution. One is in jail.

...and in fact, you are probably feeling the same irration with your current lawsuit, which AGAIN addresses the SAME pattern of actions.

Actually it doesn't. As usual, you have no idea what you're talking about.

Why do you feel such a compelling need to answer for everyone?

You don't have much experience with message boards, do you, Linda? People frequently reply to posts not addressed to them. Just read back on this thread and you'll see.

How many investigations have you REALLY done?

Dozens. And nearly all of the companies in question ended up in trouble with the SEC, or worse. NONE has ever proved to be a good investment.

As well, I don't believe you have done any "scambusting" whatsoever and are even involved in that.

Then I suggest you read the articles that have been written about me, and dip into the more than 100,000 posts I've written over the last six years. I'm gettting the feeling that you don't "believe" anything that doesn't suit your agenda.

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: lindabruzzone
In reply to: janice shell who wrote msg# 18051 Date:11/20/2003 8:55:47 PM
Post #of 18584

Janice, you claim you have done dozens of investigations...the only one I know of is preparing documents for someone mentioned in a Chicago lawsuit (online, Chicago paper) and receiving $5,000 for organizing posts for that particular lawsuit.

I hardly consider 100,000 postings on the internet performing investigations. Besides that one individual, have you ever had other clients? Has anyone paid you to testify with expert testimony in court? Just how are you an expert as an investigator? Do you have law enforcement experience as an investigator? Are you licensed as an investigator? Do you work for someone who is licensed?

What company? And, have you disclosed in any of the 100,000 posts regarding companies, for whom you have worked?

I've answered the questions you and others demanded and please note, I have given you the courtesy that wasn't given to me, to allow you to answer before making allegations of 17b violations.

Just how many clients do you currently have? And on how many boards have you posted for those clients for whom you have performed dozens of investigations?

Thank you,
Linda Bruzzone


"How many investigations have you REALLY done?

Dozens. And nearly all of the companies in question ended up in trouble with the SEC, or worse. NONE has ever proved to be a good investment.

As well, I don't believe you have done any "scambusting" whatsoever and are even involved in that.

Then I suggest you read the articles that have been written about me, and dip into the more than 100,000 posts I've written over the last six years. I'm gettting the feeling that you don't "believe" anything that doesn't suit your agenda."

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: kkgd
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 18408 Date:11/20/2003 9:00:57 PM
Post #of 18583

linda, who gives a crap who has investigated what? do you have something to say about pcbm, the scam?

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: lindabruzzone
In reply to: kkgd who wrote msg# 18409 Date:11/20/2003 9:08:12 PM
Post #of 18583

It does matter. JaniceShell has been online professing an expertise and a background as an investigator to investors...

She has claimed to have performed dozens of investigations resulting in SEC violations and alluded that she has worked WITH the SEC and other agencies...and I feel it is pertinent to ask for WHOM these investigations have been completed and why she is on bulletin boards of securities in which she does not hold an interest.

As well, there are other issues. Afterall, everyday investors frequent those boards and if there is something that isn't honest or fraudulent, or something stated to manipulate the market...then, that is very much an issue.

Thank you kkgd...

Linda Bruzzone

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: Tommy_Hicks
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 18413 Date:11/22/2003 2:57:58 AM
Post #of 18583

You don't get around much...do you?

Janice Shell has forgotten more about penny scams that you'll ever know.

Amazon Natural Treasures ..AZNT....sued by the company...

Message 10335013


The truth about the company...judgments against the ceo of AZNT....

sec.gov

Michael Sylver now faces criminal charges in Nevada concerning Amazon Natural Treasures....

Hittsgalore......

Sued by the company

Hitsgalore.com, Inc. (OTC BB:HITT - news) today announced that it has filed a Complaint against one identified and five anonymous Internet posters for Libel, Tortious Interference With Business Relations and Civil Conspiracy in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. The Complaint, entitled Hitsgalore.com, Inc. v. Janice Shell, et al., Case No. 99-1387-CIV-T-26C, seeks damages in excess of Twenty Million Dollars ($20,000,000.00). The Complaint names Janice Shell,


geocities.com

The truth about Hitsgalorie......

findarticles.com

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: lindabruzzone
In reply to: Tommy_Hicks who wrote msg# 18463 Date: 11/23/2003 12:58:21 AM
Post # of 18581

Tommy,

Thank you very much for your response. I am aware of the 1999 lawsuits against her, as well as those in years passed. I am also aware of the FBI intervention after setting up a fraudulent company in 1999, as well.

What I don't see is a history of any Nasdaq license or an investigations license, let alone any law enforcement history or employment with an investigator. I believe virtually every state in the United States requires one to perform investigations.

I seriously doubt that posting over 100,000 posts on a public bulletin board qualifies one to be an investigator. LOL

To be called an "amateur investigator" is like to refer to a police officer as an "amateur police officer" or a doctor as an "amateur doctor."

When a person recognizes a crime may exist, one reports crime. Security guards observe and report crime. Investigators investigation situations without a bias and there is clearly a bias as she has publicly stated she has difficulty with those who hold a long position in a security.

I believe to go onto a public bulletin board, to bash a stock or bash a person, under the guise of being an investigator may be a market manipulation and it may be either intimidation of a shareholder or false information relied upon by a shareholder as being credible because of the credential presented.

Just how many investigations have you all performed together? I see in Marvin vs. Shell interrogatories, she does refer to herself as an investigator. Further, she has compared her level of expertise and ability, publicly, to mine and has made public comments about my ability to perform my work without actual knowledge of me or my abilities. I believe this to be defamation.

Nonetheless, I have left messages for her attorneys and I am certain it will be resolved with some legal intervention and her CVs that give her the expertise to determine the quality of work a licensed investigator performs.

Thanks,
Linda Bruzzone

=====

Posted by: Susie924
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 18468 Date:11/23/2003 1:00:35 AM
Post #of 18592

Linda,
Why PCBM?
What in the world (or who) has brought you to this particular stock board?
Inquiring minds want to know.

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: lindabruzzone
In reply to: Susie924 who wrote msg# 18469 Date:11/23/2003 1:11:45 AM
Post #of 18593

Susie, first could you answer why you choose to bash individuals who have been incredibly victimized such as those who invested in PCBM...and to take that even further, why bash a number of securities on these boards and on Raging Bull? You certainly can't be doing it because it's "a scam," because then, you may have some level of consciousness higher than what is indicated by the posts to those poor people who have been incredibly damaged.

It is a profession? Is there some sort of joy felt from the rudeness and cruelty toward others?

And why, does it seem that there are so very few people on this entire site and on SI, as well?

Is your purpose to tear down the Raging Bull Board and bring subscribers here? Is your purpose to bring up the number of posts for this site in the event they choose to go public?

What is the purpose? And why would you harm individuals in the manner you do...is there compensation? What specifically do you get from it? You have to get something to do it day in and day out?

Or are you simply just one name, a figment of someone's imagination or perhaps a foreign individual outsourced in another country to "bash." Just what is it?

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: Susie924
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 18471 Date:11/23/2003 1:19:56 AM
Post #of 18593

Don't you just love people who answer a question with another question!!!!
Linda,
You said:
Susie, first could you answer why you choose to bash individuals who have been incredibly victimized such as those who invested in PCBM
Well now, I guess I would be one of those victims wouldn't I?

Your posts are a little too long to read but I guess the gist of what you are asking me is why am I here?
I am here because I foolishly bought PCBM thinking that the price would spike on the All Pro spinoff like it did on the Summit dividend. Oh wait, you wouldn't know anything about any of this would you??? Or would you???
I had made some nice money when I sold PCBM when it spiked at the time of the Summit spinoff but then I got greedy. Greed is such a bad thing. I gambled on another pop and the SEC came in and instead of a pop I got a fizzle.
I don't consider myself a basher. I am just stuck in a loser of a stock and I find it humorous that there are actually people who think that they will make a profit here.
If that's being a basher, then so be it.
Now back to my question to you....
What or who brought you specifically to the PCBM board????
I won't hold my breath waiting for an answer because it seems that you don't like to be questioned.
Ta ta Linda!

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: janice shell
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 18468 Date:11/24/2003 1:30:46 AM
Post #of 18594

Sorry, Linda. I was never involved in litigation prior to the April Fool's Day incident.

I am aware of the 1999 lawsuits against her, as well as those in years passed.

As for this:

I am also aware of the FBI intervention after setting up a fraudulent company in 1999, as well.

There was no company, and so no fraud. For an investigator, you're remarkably disingenuous. If you'd read all the articles about Webnode, you'd know that everyone was aware from the outset that it was an April Fool's joke. Are you aware of the one the SEC pulled last year? Do a Google search for "McWhortle".

Yes, the idiots at Bizwire called the FBI. An agent called Jeff Mitchell, who explained. The agent laughed and said "I don't have time for this kinda shit", and that was the last anyone heard from him.

You really need to get a better grip on facts, all round.

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: IH Admin [Matt]
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 18471 Date:11/24/2003 1:42:43 AM
Post #of 18595

Linda,

I understand you are a private investigator.

We share something in common. We are both Gucci-wearing professionals.

I'm a board-certified psychiatrist.

Would you like to know my diagnosis of your posts and private messages?


investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: lindabruzzone
In reply to: IH Admin [Matt] who wrote msg# 18502 Date:11/24/2003 3:38:01 AM
Post #of 18595

LOL...Matt. With what board, the parole board? Now, if you were to state you had been an assistant physical therapist in the past, I might buy that...

We do have something in common, however it isn't wearing
Gucci....

Matt, can you explain why SI doesn't have a business license in Missouri and why Infospace hasn't put out any press releases about the change in assets? Shouldn't that have been reflected in a quarterly report?

Best to you,
Linda

P.S........

Sunday, June 17, 2001, updated at 11:31AM

Whiz kid taking stock with Web site

From the bedroom of his rural home, Matt Brown, 18, works on building InvestorsHub.com, a financial website that contains research and chat rooms on many OTC "Bulletin Board" stocks, data severely lacking amongst his larger competitors such as Yahoo! and Silicon Investor. Brown hopes to license the community to a larger web entity.
Photo by Phil Sears/Tallahassee Democrat
By Juana Jordan
DEMOCRAT STAFF WRITER
MATT BROWN

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: lindabruzzone
In reply to: IH Admin [Matt] who wrote msg# 18502 Date:11/24/2003 4:51:14 AM
Post #of 18595

Okay, now that we have that settled, what is this master plan in dealing with the competition, not only with your company but with your clients?

Just how does that fit with Raging Bowl, Yahoo and some of your clients' competition? What does it have to do with small companies and federal contracts?

How much do you charge for touting or bashing? By the way, Susie, Fung Derf, Churak and others deserve a raise. Holy cow, the posts they have submitted on 22 different boards! Must be over 400 a day each, for thousands each day!

How come most of Raging Bull's bashers are sponsoring some of your boards? Why are you advertising on the Raging Bull bulletin boards for subscribers and telling people it is a hassle free site, without bashers?

Why are you allowing individuals to violate privacy laws and copyright laws?

And how did you manage to complete four years of college, three years of med school, a residency, an internship and gain board certification to be a psychiatrist by the grand old age of twenty?

Why do you have a photo of MM Mary in your office?

I think you speak with forked tongue...and that tongue would leave your Christian High School principal mortified!

Inquiring minds wish to know.

Best to you,
Linda Bruzzone

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: fung_derf
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 18507 Date:11/24/2003 10:04:40 AM
Post #of 18595

Linda, Please provide the name of your attorney so I may proceed in a lawsuit against you. I am sick and tired of your making false accusations against me, and unless you can show proof that I am (A)paid to post and (B)in any way financially compensated to post negatively regarding a stock, then I urge you to cease immediately in these claims. You have continually made libelous statements and harassed me with undue cause.
I am in process of having "Fung_Derf" trademarked, and your attempt at discrediting this name will cause me great financial stress. TIA.

Derf

investorshub.com

=====

Posted by: IH Admin [Matt]
In reply to: lindabruzzone who wrote msg# 18507 Date:11/24/2003 10:22:49 AM
Post #of 18596

I probably shouldn't dance with you, but this board is a friggin circus and you are a total whack job, so, let's tango.

>>Matt, can you explain why SI doesn't have a business license in Missouri

No idea. Remind me again how your psyche relates to a business license of a non-related company?

>>and why Infospace hasn't put out any press releases about the change in assets? Shouldn't that have been reflected in a quarterly report?

I don't know, I'm but a mere message board lackey. How could I possibly know anything about the law, or stocks, or reading filings? That's your job. Did you not get your check on the 15th?

>>Okay, now that we have that settled, what is this master plan in dealing with the competition, not only with your company but with your clients?

What are you talking about? Competition with my company and clients?

>>Just how does that fit with Raging Bowl, Yahoo and some of your clients' competition? What does it have to do with small companies and federal contracts?

My clients' competition? Federal contracts? What's the approximate length of your bong?

>>How much do you charge for touting or bashing? By the way, Susie, Fung Derf, Churak and others deserve a raise. Holy cow, the posts they have submitted on 22 different boards! Must be over 400 a day each, for thousands each day!

In the early days of iHub, you could buy me off cheap. However, we have quite the powerhouse these days. I mean, add a non-licensed business to my network like SI, and I'm THE source for your bashing and touting needs. I'll only discuss my rates over the phone.

>>Why are you allowing individuals to violate privacy laws and copyright laws?

Why are you violating my privacy, digging up very private articles that nobody has ever Googled or read before? I'm shocked and awed at your behavior!

>>Why do you have a photo of MM Mary in your office?

You should see the recent one I added of you. Nice cherry wood frame. I like to be reminded of the reasons I do what I do.

Dr. M

investorshub.com





https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=19532869

Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last ReadPost New MsgReplies (1) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Follow Board Follow Board Keyboard Shortcuts Report TOS Violation
X
Current Price
Change
Volume
Detailed Quote - Discussion Board
Intraday Chart
+/- to Watchlist