In Ovations Holdings Inc. (INOH)

[Frayed Knot]

The Defendants (stonington services, etal)filed a "motion to strike"

That's where these quotes came from:

In December 2004, Stonington Services, LLC (Stonington Services) was formed with XXXX as the sole owner. Subsequently, sixty percent of the interest was transferred to XXXX. XXXX and XXXX. are the current principals, with XXXX acting as the CEO and XXXX. acting as vice-president.

Count one of the second revised complaint alleges a cause of action for fraudulent transfer pursuant to General Statutes § 52-552e(a). Count two alleges a cause of action for common law fraudulent transfer

CONCLUSION
Based on the foregoing, the defendants' motion to strike is denied with respect to both counts.

OUCH!!

Again, I state, this gives me more than enough reason to believe that INOH and Stonington are engaged in some type of "business"...