InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,008.99
(
-1.24%
)
US TECH 100
16,850.40
(
-1.23%
)
Dow Jones
37,820.68
(
-1.66%
)
Brent Oil
86.59
(
-0.73%
)
Bitcoin
63,549.43
(
-1.14%
)
Post# of 78243
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

rickn23

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 52
Posts 9841
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/14/2007

rickn23

Re: Justafy7 post# 77839

Tuesday, 07/03/2018 9:31:15 AM

Tuesday, July 03, 2018 9:31:15 AM

Post# of 78243
It looks like a technicality with the way the SEC has handled things. It looks like the SEC has to go through the process again. Since REDG was ruled against for not responding, the same outcome can be expected.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucia_v._SEC

It has to do with appointing a judge to hear the case vs hiring one (they need to be appointed).

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up