InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 7102
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/17/2015

Re: jdcpa1 post# 23756

Tuesday, 06/19/2018 9:27:06 AM

Tuesday, June 19, 2018 9:27:06 AM

Post# of 39821
MaxD’s tweet about the RICO dismissal was business as usual. The court dismissed the RICO claims contained in the fourth amended complaint because they didn’t describe a cause of action known to law.

Leave to amend (permission try to come up with an actionable complaint) was granted, unsurprisingly - and since they tried again already with a premature 5th Amended Complaint we have a good idea what will be in it.

If they do try again, for the 6th time (the 5th try was struck, see below), likely Google will move to have that claim challenged too after August 13th. So another round of litigation in the fall, which no doubt will be described absurdly as ‘settlement meetings’ here.

Here’s the recent loss on the Attia (RICO) case:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/22802326/Attia_et_al_v_Google_LLC_et_al

Here’s the link to the other case, Google v. Max Sound:

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24235389/Google_LLC_v_Max_Sound_Corporation