Doc-this-was-my-quest-and-thinking-"most-impt-'one-Hugo-has-been-down-this-road-before last year" with-us-after-that Q3 disappoint last year and not any fin- or earnings has been sent since this release-
that was unexpected..and took us to .0041 at that time in 2017.
He seemed not worried much but we were very much so-- but again ..he seemed not ..
This is what gets me ..Joe is still here nice to hear ..really..and sent out these four some specific and last vague with legal word several days.. Time to be accepted as the answer - meaning any amount that was vague but said correct first Time with advice well.. And Done this time as opposed to first three emailed to what became misleading answers on fin's- questions asked and_ one was posted - for his replies. He reads this as part of his job..and I invite him to correct if not accurate to say his replies ended as useless and That sad for a public relations office of he his its cool so.. Be it..enuf said right - Joe.. Tell us how and why these emails x 4 were useless I am still wondering how your office works when answering it seemed the reply of the day..Unless we examine fro April 1 - when your reply was fin's already done which was a hard stop ..so let us know what you think as to why you would reply That one.
That then takes the issue to Hugo sending these untrue Times for fun"s. The 4th took a day apparently to check whats best to answer. So.. What have we got connecting dots on June.
We have a contented, to 'not post fin's- c.e.o. correct I assume right on this because he has said he does not pay attention to our pps- at this point in time So.. he demonstrates what he has been saying.. The next noticeable thing, 'is along with the gap of any information that could be a support for our share valie. Is not total silence - why do I say this, because we just had a poster talk and text confirming that he would talk to a customer / shareholder about things concerning share holders.. That could mean he has done this with selected others or not at all . Yet he did with last weeks up close photos of Hugo and inside the facility. Poster for us by you Doc..so you know. Now .. Connecting dots we have we are up to having a not so saavy smart c.e.o. in public company procedure releasing additional some information that was never published ( in part ) details on request, and part that was..For the trail followers the plot thickens ..Why - because at the same time of the info blackout part of this info was never published and may not be. The select person meeting Hugo is just one person or how many as Hugo has rules that have not been known with info..if you get my drift - at the least that is a definition for knowing things from the inside.. There interesting all want to know and one or a few do know. Well next dots to connect ..asking what is purpose for traveling to find out on the first place.. Unless writing Higo's bio which is possible ..who knows.
Most recent posted is one investor knows Joe he is with the company which again ..means the past replies were from his boss..thats cool.
Its also cool that Joe will go to a game in Miami with an investor that has I assume from past posts significant shares. That set of dots..leads others not being friends with head of public relations to wonder what these conversations have been other than to say not responsible for previous she'll.. For Joe there the usual vague answer to serious questions they worked before so if it ain't broke why fix it. At this point 2 posters have contacts inside that they have been good to post about. Imagine what the p.m. messages will be going forward. I lost all this because .. This is what I would like to be updated on if I was holding ..the stock. Some may like unsaid things or apparent info gleaned from connect dots gets posted..
The people that may or may not know what should be publicly said may feel this is a bit over the top in discussions..of so I apologize - some may want Some dot connecting also said ..
If Hugo or Joe who reads and perhaps towards-posts are as bit uncomfortable pointing out there are posts alluding to knowing info from the inside that has any type of mentioned ( outside 'possibility' ) by theory of dots connecting from one opinion today
of looking as if Some leak from the inside on a shareholder asked company issue has been shown to be possible. That should be a no worries because its been pointed it is within securities law to know things about a company from the exec office. Simply..Knowing information is not a- violation and possibly if leaking something even by mistake on a personal visit with a holder is alright even- if no public info has been Made or planned to for the shareholders to know.. this is one opinion there are others it many for the investigative silent majority checking for anything said on this recently interesting aspect of Hugo runs his company.. It his ..he feels he can do what is best for him and his company. We are At this stage in the buying selling observation area..GLTA..
