InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 2138
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2011

Re: None

Sunday, 04/01/2018 12:27:54 PM

Sunday, April 01, 2018 12:27:54 PM

Post# of 24328
1) Wondering if patient-specific or benchmark-specific

baselines are being used to examine variance that

suggests cancers. And how many and which data points are predictive. #

of VOCs & pattern interaction seem key.


Those baselines might need to be established earlier and _may_ evolve

because of time, human age, nutrition, and other independent variables.

Poppy seed consumption can trigger a heroine positive (ha Elaine).

Control of eating habits before breath test might have some influence,

but just unknown. Etc. It'd be interesting to see the automating

mechanisms/algorithms afoot to establish these key diagnostics.


imo 1 year of "in a clinical setting" will not be enough to learn this.

No use of the word "trial" concerns me (this'll have to be a double

blind scenario at that stage, little question). Then to automate the

pattern recognition via a software program that has a level of accuracy

that hospitals will trust. I'd stay away from announcements, too, since

there is a desire to know about timelines if anything is written to

shareholders (the less important ones paying for business operations or

some such claim).


So VNTH's worrying with the 100.1 billion shares, for to me that

suggests the longer timeline, and the disappearance of timeline

discussion on certain "updated" webpages makes me think my worries may

have basis. As do the non-existent official prose updates in recent

memory. As do the facts regarding the money VNTH share-selling means to

the actual clinical trial x million dollars that's been footed, or the

PhD's salary who's doing what I mentioned above to figure it out. As

does the imo ambiguous wording of the "new" webpage (e.g., "or"). If

not VNTH money contributing to those things, we know my suggestions

regarding VNTH/Nanobeak separation are not impossible.


2) I don't buy the "sloppy" claim for the VNTH "can't be relied on"

statement. Misplaced commas don't mean that. And this new group, which

includes a wealthier accountant and a lawyer? Wow, either mis-chosen

people or not mistakes? How could these people not be involved in a

filing like that? Tough to speculate on but

maybe some posters have seen something like this before. It's

suspicious to me given track records....however,

I think they would be pretty foolhardy to try such a thing, so I

agree w/ other posters on that item. So again, tough to speculate on.


SD