Monday, March 19, 2018 1:00:36 PM
So, let me try to understand the logic. They borrowed shares without borrowing them, then sold them, THEN drove down the price via other methods. Now they have to buy back shares (that they didn't borrow).
If they didn't really borrow the shares before they sold them, why would they need to buy shares to return (NON-BORROWED) shares? To whom would they possibly return shares?
And, how do they make the price go down without constantly selling shares into the bid?
And, ultimately: how did the evil shorts KNOW beforehand that Bordynuik/Heddle were going to be such knuckleheaded wrong-way fraudsters?
Wouldn't ANY kind of positive revenue/profits have crushed all short sellers (both Real and Imaginary)?
Coinllectibles' Subsidiary, Grand Town Development Limited, Acquires Rare Song Dynasty Ceramics Worth Over USD28million • COSG • Apr 18, 2024 8:03 AM
ILUS Provides Form 10-K Filing Update • ILUS • Apr 17, 2024 9:54 AM
Glucotrack Announces Expansion of Its Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology to Epidural Glucose Monitoring • GCTK • Apr 17, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment To Fire Up 24 New Stations in Louisiana • AHRO • Apr 16, 2024 1:30 PM
Cannabix Technologies Begins Certification of Contactless Alcohol Breathalyzer, Re-Brands product series to Breath Logix • BLOZF • Apr 16, 2024 8:52 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Acquires Surge Distribution LLC from Loud Beverage Group, Inc. (LBEV) • KGKG • Apr 16, 2024 8:30 AM