InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 47
Posts 696
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2017

Re: chinatown1980 post# 162471

Thursday, 03/15/2018 5:07:04 PM

Thursday, March 15, 2018 5:07:04 PM

Post# of 686171
RE: Home runs

What are you even talking about? At the ASM, Linda did not say that they had a home run nor that one was 'in the bag.'

She said that a long tail is a home run. She said that ending the trial would prevent them from gathering any additional data and that the decision as to whether or not to conclude the study would be based in part on the desire to gather evidence of a long tail if it existed. She never said anything about 'additional home runs,' whatever they are. That is something manufactured on this Board.

What exactly are you suggesting NWBO should have done? Concluded the trial based on data showing that they had not yet met the minimum number of OS events? Or figured that after 10 years the data would probably be good enough to get approval and cave to short-sighted stockholders who are more interested in finding out what is going on than on assuring approval that will make the company viable? Or are you suggesting that the trial is going to be an outstanding success and now that they have pumped themselves full of shares and warrants and increased total shares by 10% that the stock will only make it to $9 instead of $10 or whatever you think the price will be?

The only thing that is really interesting in all of this is how much useless gibberish people can invent.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News