The fact that I am THINKING of something does not make me a criminal (on this board or anywhere else) because thought is deeply protected in the American (indeed Western) moral system.
And your ad hominen response is a bit strident -- suggesting the points I raise hit a nerve. How interesting!
When I was in school, my english teacher taught me never to use the word "you" is essays. Why? because it made the whole thing personal.
May I modestly suggest we accept the same gentlemanly rules of engagemant here?
With cordial best regard to all the good people on this board,
Tino232
PS: the British Parliament does the same thing: namely adversarial comments are addressed to the Speaker of the House, not the speaker of the words who in any case stands 15ft away over the woolsack out of sword swipe range.
PPS: the right of a shareholder to sue a company is absolute, inviolate and unending. That is the right of an owner in any/all cases. That you abrogate my right is hugely beyond your power as master of ceremonies on this board beause I do not give you this power.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.