Followers | 313 |
Posts | 51099 |
Boards Moderated | 16 |
Alias Born | 08/19/2009 |
Friday, March 09, 2018 4:09:51 PM
If it is true that Asher can't hold shares in a public company (not sure that it is), Asher certainly CAN own shares in a REVOKED DBMM!
So if DBMM is revoked, they even lose that argument preventing Asher from legally taking it!
Then if they lose the revocation, IT'S OVER! There is no coming back!
So that is why Linda is finally fighting... not for her shareholders... but because she will lose Digital Clarity! She thought she had protected it from Asher's lawsuit... and she was wrong! LMAO!
Interesting insight!
Now it makes sense!
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/16/2024 09:32:32 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/29/2023 09:31:08 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/17/2023 09:15:45 PM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM