DD Support Board and Research Team

[nodummy]

I didn't see the AEXE fake press release I was busy doing research all morning.

Some links to the removed PR are still available

http://www.4-traders.com/AIM-EXPLORATION-INC-13734067/news/AIM-Exploration-Cancels-Reverse-Split-and-Initiates-Cryptocurrency-Coal-Coin-Project-26038885/

AEXE is obviously not a dead ticker so it seems like there are really only 2 likely scenarios

#1) somebody invested in AEXE wanted to try to manipulate the price with a fake press release and since AEXE isn't a dead ticker they quickly jumped on the scam and had the fake PR removed.

We know what a piss poor job Globalnewswire.com does with policing its press releases. They will let anybody print anything they want about any public company without and safe guards in place to make sure that you are a certified representative of the public company. Globalnewswire really needs to be shut down because of how often they have been a party to fraud.

If it was a fake PR, I highly doubt it was the same person that we busted for doing all those fake press releases back in December and January. It was probably a copy cat that figured it was worth the risk to break the law in order to try to manipulate the price.


#2) Somebody from AEXE put out the press release prematurely and then AEXE had it removed.

I know the CEO there loves to tweet and he didn't tweet anything about the PR being fake. I don't follow AEXE but I do know they approved a reverse split back in the fall of 2017, but they haven't been able to get it through FINRA. It's not entirely crazy to think that they may give up on getting a reverse split approved by FINRA and cancel it at some point. I also know that AEXE already announced the very same crypto operations mentioned in today's removed press release. So today's press release was really just a very small update about those operations. AEXE has been using Globalnewswire for its press releases over the past several months even as recently as last week.



Honestly, I'm sort of leaning towards scenario #2