If there were more causes of actions in the complaint it would have been shown in the tentative rulings. The defendants basically replied to the complaints and got denied by the judge. There are over a hundred causes of action in California and elements breaking it down. I think you think because it’s not in chronological order that the judge didn’t rule on those so called missing parts but it doesn’t work like that.
“There are a number of specific causes of action, including: contract-based actions; statutory causes of action; torts such as assault, battery, invasion of privacy, fraud, slander, negligence, intentional infliction of emotional distress; and suits in equity such as unjust enrichment and quantum meruit.
The points a plaintiff must prove to win a given type of case are called the "elements" of that cause of action. For example, for a claim of negligence, the elements are: the (existence of a) duty, breach (of that duty), proximate cause (by that breach), and damages.”
