InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 8690
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/05/2014

Re: JB3136 post# 504886

Friday, 01/19/2018 10:06:46 AM

Friday, January 19, 2018 10:06:46 AM

Post# of 726646
No means no, you are right, and I think he wouldn't lie. It is the truth. No assets/cash returnED or ran through WMIIC from the time of starting the dissolution up to the dissolution itself yesterday.

But IF WMIIC, in which WMIH owned the complete equity interest, had interests in safe harbor assets/independent trusts which will be distributed soon, then now WMIH owns these interests and Gallagher's statement is absolutely correct.

Why shouldn't now the parent company of WMIIC, which is WMIH, not own everything (rights, title, interests in a trust...) that WMIIC owned before its dissolution? It was a 100% sub...

why would he lie? No means No.
next theory!



---------------------------------------------------------
- Just my personal opinion, no investment advice! -
---------------------------------------------------------

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News