I try to stick to facts, while others disregard every single fact we have.
My reference to F-3 10-Q was as evidence of what SIAF actually claims as it's cash balance (not whether SIAFs claim is true or not, but what SIAF actually claims), which somehow is in strong contrast to what some posters claim that SIAF claims... It seems very strange to me that someone can put out a claim of what SIAF claims without checking the facts...
Let's make a dictionary - the first addition;
"Book smart" = SIAF claims to have pretty much no cash balance
"Street smart" = SIAF claims to have a very large cash balance
Yes, we are indeed talking different/opposing languages! I prefer to go with facts ("book smart") in terms of what SIAF claims, while you assume that SIAF claims the opposite of what is stated in the reports ("street smart"). Does this apply to all companies or just SIAF? And does it also apply to people as well? (i.e should I use "street smart" to translate your claims as well?)
Solomon isn't the only one with a credibility issue.
EDIT; Another piece for the dictionary
"Book smart" = 55 cubic yards = 5.5 x 2 x 5 (for instance)
"Street smart" = 55 cubic yards = 55 x 55 x55
