Greenshift Corporation (GERS)

[ice_n_ak]

This talk of other companies raking in the money regarding the potential GERS success of patent ownership and case against infringing companies is somewhat...interesting, but for me, an emphasis on the 'somewhat'.

The way I see it is it is the company GERS, whose name is on the legal documents pertaining to the lawsuit, mediation, court filings, etc...NOT FCC or BTZO.

IF they still own a percentage of GERS (no SEC filings in so long anything could have happened) And IF GERS succeeds with whatever legal route winds to completion, it is then that any monies, future business, royalties, etc... it is THEN that companies name will be on the checks, not some clothing company, ice cream company or whatever.

Sure, from my perspective, the other companies can own whatever shares they want BUT it is GERS who will be dispursing the money or whatever . ICM is not going to be paying BTZO

So, really a no brainer as which company to invest on pertaining to the battle between GERS and the infringing companies. It could all go down in flames anyway but unless FCC or BTZO starts showing up in the filings against the infringing companies I hope they sell a lot of whatever it is they sell. AND, how about this speculative situation? What IF GERS does well and gets a whole lot of coin. Based on the performance of the BTZO business model, maybe GERS will purchase 80% of THAT company,,,to 'bail' them out and give hope to THEIR investors.

(too many things cluttering up what really is simple: GERS vs infringing ethanol companies)