InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 4591
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2004

Re: Bilal Khabab post# 1570

Thursday, 10/12/2017 4:31:23 PM

Thursday, October 12, 2017 4:31:23 PM

Post# of 12541
I really do not understand your motive / interest.

Again, UAMA does not have any interest in the alleged IP. You also have to understand that no patents have issued in any jurisdiction. The filings are public and I encourage you to peruse the administrative documents to your hearts content.

Uama I assure you had immense interest in the IP. They are pretty much betting the company on it. Patent issued in Canada, and effectively now agreed (bar payments / admin) in the US. The ruling was a Massive win for UAMA. With a Canadian patent, Snap could ignore / ride. Even worse case was trivial. That has now changed. Read patent process ( I did ), Snap did everything to stop the US ruling and failed.

Now it’s time to talk and save their own company.