InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 209
Posts 32090
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

Re: penknee post# 125526

Tuesday, 08/22/2017 11:06:03 PM

Tuesday, August 22, 2017 11:06:03 PM

Post# of 220653
"This was in the S-1 from July 2017. "

Not meant as a criticism, but it wasn't, really. There were three filings required in order to secure the Effectiveness of the Statement.
In the original S-1 filing there was no copy of the lease included.
In the First Amended filing they included a copy of the lease (almost certainly at the request of the SEC), but the address of the property was omitted/redacted.
The version of the lease that included the excerpt that you posted was in the Second Amended filing. It included the previously omitted address information, which again was almost certainly done at the SEC's request.
https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=sunset+island&owner=exclude&action=getcompany

It will be interesting to see if those who take the tour can confirm that the address that they are driven to matches the address on the lease, if the tourists are physically able do that. ("No phones or camera will be allowed.")

But can it core A apple?
Yes Ralph, of course it can core A apple.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.