Wow. Please redefine what you're suggesting because clearly you run circles around my intellect. For two years I've been long the company. Correct. Fortunate enough to get out at times with some change in my pocket. But here's where I need to borrow you back for additional clarification: How can you be wrong in believing in particular technology? I worked across the street from these guys for years. Admittedly a small team but they're going at it day after day and everything they said in terms of the Chinese Delegates to the Pentagon representatives is true and I can vouch for it as an eye witness. Can you?
Yes, admittedly there are those on this board who have been spot on every single day for years, literally. To be crystal clear, I'm not mincing my words here. EVERY SINGLE DAY they've posted the EXACT SAME pattern of points bashing this company for years and years. If I didn't know any better I'd think it was an algorithm of sorts. For those of you who doubt what I'm implying, you can go back and look for yourselves. Oh I don't know, perhaps one posts about PR's that never came to fruition as his first line of defense and perhaps to reinforce their shaky credibility they might follow it up with a flurry of posts about share dilution, a gagged transfer agent, and "looming" reverse split. In fact that particular person just may have been posting about that reverse split for say three years now. That's EVERY SINGLE DAY on a micro penny discussion board. Hmm, that's not odd. Perfectly normal in fact, right BRoberts1982? AND glory hallelujah he's been right, right?? Wait a second, I forgot when the reverse split took place. Please enlighten me when you have a moment.
The point is you applaud someone for bastardizing a company that has a 1 in 1,000,000 chance in success. It's called a micro penny stock and I'd say the probability of failure is just a little bit in your favor so cheers. It takes serious guts and revolutionary intelligence to tell people that water is wet.
