InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1341
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/06/2014

Re: rekcusdo post# 415491

Monday, 06/05/2017 7:11:47 PM

Monday, June 05, 2017 7:11:47 PM

Post# of 792660
Unconscionability rears its head in contracts where the bargaining powers of one of the parties in the contract were removed to the point that the party had no actual choice in making the contract. There is no known evidence to show such a situation occurred.

Surely you jest .

Unconscionability is a contract term. We know, actually, that contract based claims are not judicially barred under HERA. Therefore, this claim would not be barred under HERA.

Claims of duties of FHFA have been unilaterially dismissed. These actions, any actions are based in contracts, they've all been washed away like the snow and the rain.

Running a stop sign is not, in and of itself, illegal. In fact, in many states, the law states that you must slow at a stop sign and stop if necessary. In all states, you must only comply with a driving regulation if is safe to do so (hence why the "If I slowed down, it would have been dangerous because of the flow of traffic" defense works so well for many speeding tickets).

This is why there must be a trial prior to determining something is illegal. Because defenses may turn an illegal act into a legal one.


More of the same. Either it is or it isn't. Pick a square any square just stay on it.

Problem with fhfa and treasury they pick the argument / defense to sway between on and off. Like a light switch. And here yet the same. Truth is its not the truth. eh.