InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 169
Posts 10531
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/17/2015

Re: LOVE*PINK post# 141633

Saturday, 05/27/2017 6:11:06 PM

Saturday, May 27, 2017 6:11:06 PM

Post# of 343296
Sure, they could be revoked; but they are able to, and expected to furnish/ file an answer and attend a hearing. Revocation is not automatic, despite what is being said here - though history of prior companies under the same circumstances is not in DBMM's favor. Like I said, we will see what happens at the end of the ten(10) days...Many believe DBMM's situation is unique from the previously revoked. See below, and here:

https://www.sec.gov/investor/alerts/tradingsuspensions.pdf
-------------------------------------------
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file an Answer to the allegations contained in this Order within ten (10) days after service of this Order, as provided by Rule 220(b) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. § 201.220(b). If Respondents fail to file the directed Answers, or fail to appear at a hearing after being duly notified, the Respondents, and any successor under Exchange Act Rules 12b-2 or 12g-3, and any new corporate names of any Respondents, may be deemed in default and the proceedings may be determined against them upon consideration of this Order, the allegations of which may be deemed to be true as provided by Rules 155(a), 220(f), 221(f), and 310 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice, 17 C.F.R. §§ 201.155(a), 201.220(f), 201.221(f), and 201.310.