InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 632
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/19/2017

Re: Fido post# 17604

Wednesday, 05/24/2017 12:29:19 PM

Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:29:19 PM

Post# of 26174
So would you, as a hypothetical banker, be in favor of an ADDED layer of protection? Say one that initiated encryption from the keystroke and held that encryption to the display or database of the recipient using 26 encryption keys instead of the currently available industry standard of 1? That held data on disk (cloud included) as encrypted content safe and secure from the exploitation of cracks and crevices in the various operating systems?

I certainly would be although I would not jump at such wild claims with reckless abandon. They would have to be proven.

Pretty sure that's what's happening right now. Validian Protect is being proven. They passed their third party verification process in 2015 and are now being vetted by industry. Don't expect that you or I or anyone else know what is going on behind the curtain. It is not in Validian's interest at this time to show all of their cards. When the time is perceived to be right, the world will know whether V is the real deal or not. Seems to me that if the wild claims were not true someone with some credibility would have come out saying just that. So far the only ones saying V is garbage are a few penny stock message board posters with no widely known reputation for truthfulness or expertise on the subject.

No hidden agenda here, I hold a significant stake in VLDI. I am convinced that they are the real deal and have put my money in alignment with my beliefs. I believe Bruce Benn will be the next Jan Koum.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.