Monday, February 13, 2017 2:09:34 AM
http://www.barrons.com/articles/BL-TB-54031
Gotta love that Fli's wireless charging solution does not expose users to radiation in the way that other approaches seem to -- even if those others say they're safe, which one would you choose??
Gotta also like that Fli's approach seems to offer more wattage than others => faster charging ...
Who doesn't prefer that??
I know, I shouldn't get excited about it.. it's way early and there's loads of competition and competing approaches.... then again there's over 1 billion smart phones, tablets, external batteries, and cordless devices in the US alone that could be charged this way... even if Fli captures just 5% of the market, could easily be worth FH's entire market cap IMHO
I'm probably missing something ... do your own homework please
You figure it out and then let me know ok??
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM