InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 1387
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/21/2015

Re: Zlinger post# 16573

Wednesday, 02/01/2017 10:14:12 AM

Wednesday, February 01, 2017 10:14:12 AM

Post# of 27670
Furthmore, you have ignored/haven't commented on what I have actually stated. Take a second and comment on the following and have some discussion rather than dismissing it:

"Zlinger, there will not be an "approval". However, the government AND police both require scientifically validated clinical trial results that demonstrate the accuracy of the device before implementation and re-structuring of policy. It's not an approval, it's proof. They need results.

Cannabix is several years from having that data. If not longer.

They have detected it in a lab, that is what I previously stated. And yes, that is true, they have. I also stated that it's a matter of time before field testing. Yes, a matter of time, that is true. How long? A long time to field testing, several years of testing, then months of analysis of data, then interpretation takes months, then it could take years to fine tune the device based on the results, then finally it could take a year or two before it's on the road.

Ultimately it's not possible for Cannabix to be on the road in less than 3-4 years. That's fact. 3-4 years is extremely generous. It's more likely to take 5. Hound Labs will be to market much before that as they are already field testing. Breathtec will be to market with Na-NOSE in 1-2 years, again, much before Cannabix. Breathtec will also be to market with FAIMS in 3-4 years. Why faster than Cannabix? They are detecting abundant compounds in breath, easy to detect in large quantities compared to fleeting amounts of THC that leave the system in the parts per billions in 2 hours...

That's all fact and based on my experience working in the field."
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BLOZF News