InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 3408
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2016

Re: Spartan post# 100870

Tuesday, 11/15/2016 7:47:05 AM

Tuesday, November 15, 2016 7:47:05 AM

Post# of 233312
Totally agree, except they need several contracts and I don't give any credibility to comments made under forward-looking SEC protections. Not excusing those statements of the past, I just don't give them any credibility because of the BS forward-looking protections afforded. The numbers are the proof.

Anyhow, as they get more "confidence," they can start to pull the plug on creating hopes and dreams to falsely satisfy rightfully pissed-off, long-suffering shareholders. I think the Lugee association has done that. Lugee is saying 2017, he's committing big dollars of his own at risk, while selling off shares of Eon to do so.

I do wish more companies would give a day or 2 to scour financials before a c.c., so reasonably informed questions can at least be asked about reported disclosures and numbers.

Not saying we're in a great spot, just saying they need to keep building and since Lugee has so much skin in the game, knowledge, direction and CONTROL, they are as best positioned as they'll ever be. Truthfully, they've run out of second, third, fourth, etc chances. This is it for them, but Lugee has too much to lose now and a lot of drive and self-interest in seeing his stock price move up. GL.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News