I enjoy this moment of encouraging information drift and trust in the thinking of the managment to release or not release PR's as needed.
Its easy to see there are significant things in the works--we are not blind with the clues we have in hand, but its also not difficult to image why, strategically, QMC might not PR the latest news bits.
1) a possible shift toward more "underpromise, over-deliver" thinking. If so I'm fine with this. I think there are factual, product related, revenue related events on the near horizon and i'm look forward to unambigous, impactfull PRs as concrete events play out.
2) regarding Uniglobe: They are introducing QMC. At a major trade event. Despite our impatience as investors--lets let them do this. Why race to over-explain this when the timing of more news is unambiguous and Uniglobe has picked up the microphone. Personally, I want to hear from them not QMC. I think this is a very positive PR moment without the PR from QMC. Very cool on the part of QMC management.
3) regarding the recent QMA meeting, the announcement of a giant fund is indeed fascinating--but who yet knows what this means? private, corporate, government funds? It is no surprise that QMC has little or no experience with how this fund materializes--and no surprise that a QMC press release is not yet the place for providing more information on this. Again, a super positive development- but hard to nail down in a PR without over-reaching at this point. If this is government funding I assume everyone respectfully awaits a government PR. Or maybe its an investment fund that will open its doors to investors when ready? Again, I've developed some faith in the strategic thinking of QMC management and I'm very happy, for the moment, watching things unfold.
IMHO
GLTA
AI
