I think you are disingenuous Tamhas. I read the article you mentioned but was not impressed with its depth or understanding of arcam's achievements. But yes it did mention Arcam. I never said arcam was never mentioned. But the article I referred to did not mention arcam and the fool frequently poorly portrays arcam and the 3d printing industry. Does not fully give arcam credit for its aviation progress with GE, mention that the differences in what companys provide, metal vs plastics, and the focus of each. What period of time were those 107 articles published. Please note I never said MF did not ever mention arcam, only that it gave arcam short shrift and i'll go further many of the articles are not totally accurate re arcam and its focus and achievements.
Now you can have your own opinion as can I. But ccompared to the focus on ddd and ssys, I DEFY any poster to argue with documention that arcam is given its just due in either number of articles or content of articles. No one can argue that arcam gets its share of ink. I will take a brief look see but I bet the bulk of MF 3d printing articles do not mention arcam and that most of the recent 3d printing articles do not either mention arcam or give it a fair and accurate shake re what its accomplishing. The one that prompted my comment sure did not. Just like you should not see bogey men competitors in every press release and articl, one article on arecam dos not a trend make. BUt thanks for having the need to count all the arcam references MF did in what ever period you used But I DEFY you to make the case that arcam as the only 3d printing company showing a profit, executing and showing good sales revenue growth is given its fair due with motley fool or any other widely read media arena. I only count what I as a general USA investor can access.
AI
