I see Goodguybill as being 100% correct and I see Austinmediga as being 100% correct.
One being a cheerleader and the other a warner, nothing wrong with either until will learn the end of the story.
I wonder why Goodguybill won't look at Austin's worst case basis or questioning mgmt if you would scenario since it is only prudent. I also appreciate his repeating the warnings otherwise it will be ALL Goodguybill radio show.
I also wonder why Austin has the propensity to be such doomsday like poster , I could swear he was positive a couple of years ago but I could be wrong. Obviously both an't be right, but I want to hear both sides of the argument. The odd thing is Austin promotes discussion whereas Goodguy rather see Austin shut up and that is what irks me.
I also realize that Austin does look at both sides of the coin but fear Goodguy doesn't. I believe all need to question since this story is extremely complicated and contradictory at times. One cannot forget that Lp has pumped the stock by having PR's right before cash raisers and always painting a rose picture. Now granted one would assume a CEO needs to be positive an convincing but often the promises never come to fruition for one reason or another and we are then left in the dark. And most of the time the mystery is blamed on the story that she can't divulge or she will screw up exactly what she is promising to achieve so it becomes a never ending story and puts his in the uncomfortable position of being in the dark after a cash raise and trying to figure out on our own what is going on, quire frustrating is you ask me. And anyone who complains is classified as a naysayer, a shorter or someone who doesn't believe (i.e. or trust LP) in LP and/or the science which isn't fair. No one seems to be classified as a dreamer or someone that only believe is the 100% positive side which is crazy.
This forum is getting pretty scary imho. I am quickly losing faith in its members for when I post I am either blamed for not doing any/partial DD or I am a plant for the shorter conspiratorists. Next I will be called a member of the notorious PhaseV gang.
I happen to read and respect Flipper a great deal but my one concern with his writing is that I have near read anything remotely negative that he has produced. This fact seems impossible, and I take it to prove that he purposely never ays anything that will possibly hurt his investment or the stock. So from him it will either be positive or nothing. But that leads to an important issue, he has done the most DD, understands the science better than anyone else but will not be balanced openly. it seems that he promotes NWBO's policy of only announcing positive news and thus why some have said he might have ties to the company. I don't believe that he does but I must admit it si strange that he writes only in the positive. Maybe he can shed some light on this, he never has explained his position before. But without his writings I surely wouldn't be into this company and I don't know how many others might feel the same way or have done the same thing.
AI
