InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 3334
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 05/26/2010

Re: BigE1960 post# 38678

Saturday, 06/13/2015 8:23:28 PM

Saturday, June 13, 2015 8:23:28 PM

Post# of 104561
LOL, Logistics. Am really glad you discern potential benefits for Nanoco if or when Dow builds said plant.
I like QMC's position much better. They could have a MR delivered on site when and where needed with revenues going to the company rather than being dependent on another and receiving royalties. QMC will be paying royalties......Big Difference to me.


You referred to 84 lbs per week and that, "QMC may be newbies with limited experience and resources".
"This is neither "Green Stamps" nor an infomercial business. I've never heard S/H used in chemicals or polymers."

Shipping & Handling, (aka delivery charges) imply a delivery service, (which may involve planes, trains, ships, and or auto of some kind).

OK, I'm intrigued. What is your economical solution for delivery of product from the US to Korea?


In regard to large quantities: ...just imagine the flack that would be generated if said transportation was to crash and spill tonnage of QDs upon the ground or into the water.

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.