InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 241
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2014

Re: None

Thursday, 01/22/2015 12:04:34 AM

Thursday, January 22, 2015 12:04:34 AM

Post# of 2353
lol lol lol... It is no surprise that this news release was issued subsequent to the initial raise and more pointedly subsequent to representations being made directly to the company that if the anti-dilution or ratchet provisions were in force this deal could be taken as a breach of fiduciary duty by the new director.

Simply put, either the company was caught with someone's hand in the cookie jar and they had to back off or Raefield made a stupid deal without thinking of the consequences and the company had to cover its tracks. Or, a long shot would be that everything was up and up and they simply took their time to release the info.
I'm still not sure about the CDN issue as it relates to warrants.

But, it's good that we were watching. IMO