InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 19
Posts 2315
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/12/2013

Re: dcspka post# 27174

Wednesday, 12/31/2014 3:00:21 PM

Wednesday, December 31, 2014 3:00:21 PM

Post# of 30046
DC You Said

"They are just meant to be inflammatory opinions to deride Radient investors who intend on benefiting from the upcoming merger with Provista."

Lets play devils advocate..What if the poster who stated that Radient and Mac, was a scam in theory you understand, and if it was a FACT and not an OPINION...What are the remedies? Can a class action suit be filed with lets say with "The Rosen Law Firm" as a representative..It only takes two shareholders to file a class action suit...Correct? Heck, we a handful in our group if need be you understand...According to Delaware law, the director and board at the time of the corporation going void on March 1, 2013 are still the appointees by the shareholders from their proxy in 2011..Makes it even a good reason to hold on to their certificates in my opinion..Hopefully, someone on the left will also weigh in..What do you say? It's Just one mans opinion you understand...Guardiangel




dcspka Wednesday, 12/31/14 12:13:17 PM
Re: guardiangel post# 27173
Post # of 27176
They are just meant to be inflammatory opinions to deride Radient investors who intend on benefiting from the upcoming merger with Provista.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.