Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Crow3::
I think you might be wrong on what your assumptions are.
Mr. Shriver ( Tim ), has all the authority any CEO would have in any Company. I think, once again, you have under estimated the power of shareholders.
I also believe you may have under estimated the ability of Mr. Shriver.
Crow3::
Funny how some just cannot understand that many do care about how CDEX reacts to what is needed to be done.
There has been some real good thoughts on having some additional shares placed into the reserve.
Mr. Shriver will have his mustard tested quickly. Lets hope he does the right thing with those shares.
Anyone at the Tucson Lab this am?
rottenapple::
Do you really think someone did not listen to shareholders already??
I think shareholders made a difference already.
As far as the increase in shares, so be it, if it happens.
My thoughts would be that Mr. Shiver will run a pretty tight ship.
Lets see how the vote turns out and what else comes from the sm.
sanddollar::
No, I don't know that anyone sold stocks.
I have read it on this board, and maybe another board.
I have not known anyone who purchased stock from Harris or any of the others you mentioned.
I really was just wondering.
Xenophone::
Did you buy stock certs from Dennis Harris or Rod or Robert or Greg or Malcolm or Jim?
You read about this stuff from time to time, but you really wonder if it actually hppened.
Crow3::
Might I guess from your names listed, that these are all the non shareholders?
Viking65, might these names be the non shareholders?
Xenophon::
I agree about how things appear. I think the next CEO will be a bit more experienced and a bit more shareholder friendly.
I might be willing to give Mr. Shiver a fair shake at staying in the top 3 positions. It does appear that he is liked by both sides.
By chance, are you a non shareholder?
Viking65::
Did you say that there non-shareholders on this board? Well, I guess that sums it up.
Just when I thought this was just some slightly upset shareholders, I find out that they are not even shareholders.
Has capnmike been around as long as some of these non-shareholders?
Do you know if the ones you are talking about, have ever been a shareholder?
d4diddy::
Is these two alias's one in the same? I am sure you might know. After all, you have been around a couple of years.
You and this company might need to look for the real help it takes to take the stock price in the other direction.
scarednomore::
I am a bit of a gambler, and I would bet that Mr. Griffin was just not the man for this company. His track record show nothing but due south.
Then again, maybe that was a direction of choice. Sometimes private is more appealing than public.
But like you said, the real facts may never be known. Look for the ship to be righted and the good to prevail.
Crow3::
He sould be at your house.
The government has allowed the loud mouths to take from the good and give to the bad.
But my feeling is that more than you think remember use irthday it was on Dec. 25th.
It is really not about dates, now is it. More about faith, wouldn't you say.
Xenophone::
You probably thought that Mr. Griffin was gonna stay around for a little more time too!
I think you are probably mistaken about Dr. Poteet.
d4diddy::
I was born rolling sevens, but I doubt that means anything to you. And then I went away for a few years.
Xenophon::
The fact, he, (Dr. Poteet) has developed a product that has already saved a few lives, is a bit more note worthy than what I have done, or either of you have done.
It may be a bit hard for you two to understand, but those children are alive today, because of a product that was present at the hospital those children were at.
Was one of the children saved, either of yours? Well, were they?
Now whether those few lives saved, ever equates to more that 12 cents on the stock market for Cdex ( Valimed ), is completely irrelevant.
Even you and 4diddy can agree to that. A kind word, or better yet, just cut the bs that continues to flow from your keyboards, would be a good start.
Children's lives were saved because of Valimed. Neither of you can top that. I trust that had it been one of your childen saved, your postings surly would be different.
It's Christmas, there are a few more children going to celebrate it because of what Dr. Poteet made. I for one, am very greatful for what he made.
Crow3::
Maybe if you spent a little more time making Christmas what it it really is and a little less time posting post on wrong boards, you might find the joy in Christmas instead of what you have expressed it is.
I think one can make oneself and others not enjoy the true meaning of any event. Whether it be Christmas, Easter, Thanksgiving, etc.
Maybe a little heart searching about how you could be effecting yourself and others is needed.
highC:
I am thinking that sometimes all may not be so lost as some may think. I do believe that to think CDEX is going to be a zero stock may be as silly as to think it could be a $50.00 stock.
But there is a Christmas coming, whether CDEX goes to one cent or one dollar.
The balancing act is to see what does happen or does not happen with the continuing slide of stock price. Any company that believe's it has a real shot, will not sit back and take no action.
Who knows, maybe the investors are talking.
Crow3::
Maybe the ceo is just going to do the right thing for a change. Sometimes a better solution is but a u-2 away. One can always rest assured that when good people put their heads together that results will happen.
One can always be aware of the belly crawler that talks about ends that have no beginnings, nor agreements that were ever written, nor settlements that were ever settled.
I would think a better plane to fly on would be the one that has actual filings that can be read, touch and goes that bear fruit, and a documended beginning with a factual ending.
A fasten seatbelt has come on.
sanddollar::
I think there has been 4 ceo's from the beginning of this shell. There has been 2 ceo's of CDEX-Inc.
However, maybe there has yet to be a business enriched ceo of CDEX. One could easily conclude that CDEX may have not had the best people in the proper positions for the optimum positioning of CDEX-Inc.
I think it is clear, that the tech has merit and works, which would lend me to speculate that the marketing of the tech has been weak.
sanddollar::
Maybe a little help would make it easier.
One might conclude from the time that the previous ceo departed and the current ceo came on board, that the stock price has gone south.
One then might conclude that the current ceo has not been successful.
One might think that either the tech does not work, or the current ceo just cannot get the job done.
If the tech has honestly saved one life, or kept an error from happening, it works.
Thus, one thing to consider is changing the ceo.
rottenapple::
I think that to hype CDEX at this point is silly. However, I really think the stock price speaks quite clearly as to the effect of what you might consider hype.
It has been asked before and I think still needs to be answered. Does enough hospitals, patients, insurance carriers, really know about, and understand what CDEX-Inc has.
rottenapple::
I agree that a little humor by a little talent on a keyboard can make one smile.
sanddollar::
What would be the 3 things you might do to change the direction of cdex.
rottenapple::
I think it might be a bit early to say the shareholders will not respond, if given a good cause to respond to.
rottenapple::
You might have a good point about the shareholders getting together. If the right plan can come together, I think that the shareholders would come together.
A good point to keep in mind!
d4diddy::
I think Baxa was the last group or person that had warrants to exercise.
I do not think they were exercised.
sanddollar::
I was not arguing with him. I think some grants are based on what the tech really has potential to offer.
If the tech has saved one life, and the childrens hospital that the life was saved at, will verify that to the grantor. Then.......... maybe a grant is issued.
demmo47:
I might think that Grant money is used in both ways. Any time someone, government or other, grants money to a cause, they never know if the cause will succeed or not.
The idea, the technology, and the promise it potentially shows are some of the key area's looked at, when grant money is awarded.
Capnmike::
Yes, I think you are correct. But lets not continue to point out the obvious. Sometimes that has a way of coming back to help those that may need to move on.
You think about what I have said, and see if you do not agree.
Sassy::
I would think that the volume might indicate a change at the top or some type of news. Or maybe there is a little speculating going on. I don't think that this company needs to continue in reverse.
Happy holidays to you as well.
Sassy::
I think you seem to be a real nice person. I too, hope you have a wonderful birthday.
Do you have a thought as to why the volume has been a bit higher yesterday and today.
Capnmike::
Do you believe that the conference call properly addressed the issue as to the lack of "real" exposer for lives saved? I too have wondered, as the caller who asked the question as to the non-existance of press releases concerning how the Valimed Unit is doing.