Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Filed over 1 year ago. Old news
It was outright fraud. Shareholders dumped money in because of the PR's advertising for the new company purchase. I tried a long time ago to see if folks would like to join in together for an attorney but no one came around. I think its just too embarrassing. However, I don't even believe the POS is dead. Just another OTC devil in disguise
Indy They are not buying like regular folk. Warrants or given shares at dirt cheap, and reselling at a higher price on a regular basis. So if you can rinse and repeat, have loads given to you at .005, and you can sell at .008 or ? on a regular basis, you've got the perfect money making operation. The longer the court case goes, the more money you can make.
The crook wasn't thinking he'd be croaking. More like he would be sitting on an island somewhere with all the $$ he outright scammed people. Very last words he told he wife was, can I take an air conditioner where he's going?
ALL CLOSED CALIFORNIA CASES, CLOSED. That includes Twittter & Apple. They have patents, but if no one is infringing on them, you get 0 $$. The only thing VP has going is ANTI-Trust to BULLY T-MOB & VZ, and keep handing out cheap shares to their co-conspirators so they can continue the charade, and keep making money selling shares to line their pockets. They aren't in any hurry for a court date. The longer it goes on, the more cash they line their pockets gifting, and then selling the shares. Its amazing, Emug knows how to do a PR on new Anti-Trust BS. But still can't be bothered to do a PR that the other cases were thrown out of Albright's court
GreenBackClub Thank you!
NYT, they are passing out mega millions more shares in the last few days. Browsing through them, I wonder which one of those cheats is Deerballs
Very well stated! Did anyone notice why there was a new PR today, finally,, and no mention of Albrights rulings from July 29th?
I take notice of a lot of things, keep detailed history of posts. At some point pumpers think they've disappeared. Eventually while I know they're out there shopping to buy their second mansion, the first letter usually arrives. Causes a heck of a lot of sleepless nights and the attorneys fees that hurt like hell
Yes, I am cryptic. If not my posts get removed from IHUB, and you want them here to look back on a year from now.
My posts do require you doing some of your own research. If I just give you the answers you won't accept them. If you care to know the truth you will do your own provided research. So, rather than asking the others who won't tell you, do it yourself just as I do. (the others don't want you to know)
I do have to wonder if a certain poster here who always has connections to the IR just might be his brother, who is suddenly included on a lawsuit. Don't you find it odd that just one poster hears from the IR almost daily (although he refuses to share his info).
If you took the time to look into some of the always optimistic posters here (who refuse to say anything negatively publicly??), they have the same date for their first post which happens to be when the stock was at an all time high of 11 cents.
And then there is the poster whose very first post was to explain why Barbara was able to dump stock....No questions about the company, just came in here knowing what the insiders were doing. Find that odd at all?
Many of you talk of lawsuits being worth BILLIONS of dollars, and yet the entire company is valued at $42.73 million via shares authorized. Now wouldn't you think any of these massive companies being sued would just buy the company (easy enough as the insiders are dumping weekly), and put the company into bankruptcy? Use your head.
Oh yeah, and now lawsuits moving away from Texas courts. I told you a few days ago the Waco Judge has come under fire for being too lenient. Now they are taking new cases to D.C.? Well that should give them a few more years of dumping.
Yes I know, more rambling from me, but with only one post per day and so much discovered info. I need to be concise....that and I want to give NYT a run for his money in words used.
Hope the pumpers saved enough of the money they got paidpumped them. Attorneys are expensive
Just let him keep pumping. The icing on the cake was when he starting saying he was getting info direct from INZA. Its exactly the evidence the SEC needs and makes it even easier.
prophet2
Re: None
Tuesday, August 20, 2024 2:39:33 PM
Post#
132276
of 132276
HEY DEERBALLS, can you please explain to everyone how this recent news is good for shareholders. You said that it brought in more "eyeballs" but unfortunately those eyes view it as negative as indicated by the current share price. IMO, we may be lucky to hold one cent and without additional news which discloses money to Voip pal that helps with the massive dilution then we will likely stay sub two cents for a long time. You are a pumper plain and simple and in my eight years plus here I have never seen you right on any of your predictions/surprises. Just be honest, you were compensated by the company to get new investors and keep them engaged despite the hardship and losses that most shareholders have incurred. Chew on that for awhile one post wonder. P.S- You renewed our feud when you singled me out by name on Stocktwits. Have a good day and good luck explaining to Frio, Arizona et al how this is all going to work out. the prophet
Good post. But But Anti-Trust for ?
GreenBackClub Where can we view the attachment to you mentioned
T Mobile is over
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WACO DIVISION
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
T-MOBILE USA, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 6:21-cv-674-ADA
FINAL JUDGMENT
At the Final Pretrial Conference held July 9, 2024, the Court announced on the record that
(1) Defendant T-Mobile USA, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Amend Answer to Add
Counterclaims (Dkt. No. 88) is GRANTED; (2) Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions Based on
VoIP-Pal’s Violation of Court Order (Dkt. No. 219) is DENIED; and (3) Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement (Dkt. No. 136) is GRANTED. The Court issued a
written opinion granting Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement on July
29, 2024. Dkt. No. 272. The Court now enters its Final Judgment as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that final judgment of non-infringement is entered in favor of Defendant
and against Plaintiff. Plaintiff shall take nothing in this action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any and all motions not previously ruled upon by the
Court are DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s remaining counterclaims and defenses
are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s defenses to Defendant’s remaining
counterclaims are dismissed without prejudice.
Case 6:21-cv-00674-ADA Document 273 Filed 08/15/24 Page 1 of 2
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant may file a motion for attorney’s fees and
costs, with supporting documentation in accordance with Local Rule CV-54(b)(2), within the time
frame prescribed by the Local Rules.
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the
case.
SIGNED this 15th day of August, 2024
The 10-Q was before Huawei dismissal, and some of the action going on more recent
I wonder what rule VPLM violated? (2) Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions Based on
VoIP-Pal’s Violation of Court Order (Dkt. No. 219) is DENIED
And if the Judge will dismiss the 2 newer cases files?
Revenue for 2023 grew to $156,444,000 They need an accountant to show who the crooks are
Chazzy1 So well perfectly laid out. Thanks!
Here comes another. Why not 2 weeks, or 4 weeks, on how about Tuesday at noon? Spill some fact or don't waste time typing or everyone's else's time
Atltraderken
Re: None
Sunday, August 11, 2024 10:12:21 PM
Post#
132083
of 132084
Good things coming in about 3 weeks...
Chazzy1 from what I remember there were Summ Judgments on the table for both parties. Albright obviously ruled in favor of the defendant, and the Motion for Costs. And Huewai, the case was dismissed, where as the case with Amazon said there was some sort of agreement shown? There were notes a few months back I saw about VP not disclosing certain things to the court, and if that happened that would have pissed off the Judge. Emil is long overdue for some sort of PR, and all of them shouldn't have been speeding up the sale of their shares
Good Rich doesn't think a Summary Judgment against VP is a big deal. I guess if the Sheriff comes in to seize the furniture & everything else, its no huge thingy.
Warren agree with you. Just a suggestion to anyone. I've learned over the years to play with any OTC stock shorter term. News is good, but waiting for any kind of jackpot news isn't realistic at all. All the shares of VPLM I hold is free from the profits over the years. I bought more over a week ago when it tanked, and dumped some of it some this week. The old story, buy the rumor, sell the news, especially works very well with OTC. I will be sad if this company croaks, but I wont be crying about having any huge losses. OTC's were not meant to hold long term. All the anticipation that's going on can be a good opportunity to make a few $$ on this stock. Dump some on the highs, and take the profits to buy more on the dips
Those are good thoughts and I hope it could work out like that. However, the Summary Judgment in this case what I'm seeing it was awarded to the defendants. And the motion looked like pay the other sides costs as well. At the rate the executives have ramped up selling their stocks, & the lack of any PR's, it doesn't sit well with me. Maybe there's a decent settlement deal made with Amazon that will be great news for shareholders. And who knows what else. Unfortunately if a Judge or Jury says they aren't infringing by using any of their patents, there's no penalties or royalties due.
I guess Summary Judgment with NON-Infringement AGAINST VPLM is all positive?? A whole new meaning to a Judge's ruling? And I assume you keep talking about you've been communicating directly with Rich Inza? Did you both meet in the same facility?
DeerBalls
Re: Dontnosheet post# 132003
Wednesday, August 07, 2024 5:35:56 PM
Post#
132018
of 132018
Even considering your self-descriptive handle, this is exceedingly lame:
So, you can't come up with scenarios where an IR might be in contact with a shareholder to this extent????? REALLY? The 7000+ texts are just on this phone, but here we go:
Maybe I'm related to Rich, or Emil?????
Maybe I've been supportive of VPLM for 11+ years?
Maybe I've made over 13,000 posts in support of VPLM?
Maybe I've introduced individuals to VPLM who represent hundreds of millions of VPLM shares?
Maybe Rich and I communicate on VPLM, as well as other subjects???
Maybe my phone will only accept one word texts?
Maybe I'm in contact with a fair number of VPLM holders?
Maybe I'm Irish and considered a good luck charm?
Maybe I'm just charming?
I could go on and only a few of the above are true!
"Substantive" does not equate to "insider"!
As to the big "thingy" and timing: Well, it hasn't happened yet, so I was wrong last week! Oh, Lord, can I be redeemed? I was wrong AND ADMIT IT!! I don't think I'll be wrong by much and I would think you might realize things as complex as VPLM developments can have some hiccups.
What major calls have you ever been correct on, OTHER THAN LOOKING BACKWARDS???
No surprises over the past year and a half? Really? Agreements with amzn/huawei? Ray Leon and our new advisory board?????????? Patents in India? New attorney added to the team?
So, I would suggest you run along, put your collective heads together and come up with another, in a long line of brilliant "in our opinion" posts! I'll be sitting on the edge of my seat in wait!
Yeah, I could say I spoke to Emil again. And of course he he can't say much. Just said Patience Is A Virtue. Asked me if I sold my boat yet and bought more shares? lol. Come on man. The VP Executives need to have people to keep selling to. Wish people on these posts weren't pumpers & dumpers wasting our time. Next thing you know people someone will say they just spoke to Elvis who is buying more shares
DesktopDR
Re: Dontnosheet post# 131960
Tuesday, August 06, 2024 8:39:32 AM
Post#
131967
of 131987
No need to bash DB. Rich can only say very little. I have a neighbor that speaks to Rick periodically and says that Rich is very excited and says be patient. I know it's been a long haul, and most would all love to jump ship to reduce stress, but I'm going to stay and be patient.
Nyt Very logical and well stated!
Deerballs Why don't you give a few details. Just a few, if you're so informed. You're not an employee of the company, so there are no restrictions, unless you spread untrue information
Even TradingView has more frequently posting multiple quotes about VPLM Executives in Significant Share Sale Transactions. Chang especially has increased his sales of his shares to sometimes 3 times a day. Barbie has done twice a day sometimes. If they really cared about shareholders they wouldn't do that without communicating something to the shareholders
Have to prove someone is infringing on your valid patent. It would be easy to prove if you invented something like the cheeseburger. But in the case of the technology like VPLM, very complex to prove
Chazzy1- Its well said and I agree. The only thing that bothers me is Summary Judgment. If you read everywhere, a SJ isn't typically a positive for against a Plaintiff
DB is just another pumper with nothing better to do for entertainment and $$
Yes, accurate. And I dont recall Emil ever giving any detail about a settlement with AMZN
WarrenBufferwanabe, I agree with you. However SEC is corrupt, especially when it comes to OTC
Just another chinese pumper scheme. Lots of talk, $0 revenue, no talk of going Pink. In the OTC its even easier if your in china
Midwestrader-- great post. And the way I'm reading it, it looks like its filed by the Fed's against the company & personally. So they shouldn't have a lot of problem tracking down all the money they stole
Re: AtomicPhoenix61 post# 70030
Friday, August 02, 2024 10:40:54 AM
Post#
70031
of 70032
Thanks for posting that. That lawsuit document is a MUST READ for everyone. It shows the make up of this POS FRAUD of a Company. While those employees went unpaid Matty boy was DUMPING SHARES right and left and then claiming they had no income. Total BS!
MIA MATTY DUMPED over FOUR BILLION SHARES from 7/3/23 to 7/1/24. Those are FACTS and I have the screenshots from OTC MARKETS showing the PROOF.
Total shares DUMPED:
4,112,739,302
If Ledbetter's attorney needs them I will gladly email those from that time period or any other time period in the last THREE YEARS.
WarrenBuffetWantabe Patents are all great. Is anyone infringing? Ok, so why are the members dumping more amounts of their shares regularly if they felt mildly positive of some sort of news in the near future?
WarrenBuffetwantabe Thanks for the good info
Rapz Excellent!
Golfer. I cant find anything in google
not a basher. I've been involved in VPLM for over a decade every step, and I'm rooting for them. Just following the facts. As well I knew both sides asked for Summary Judgments. Albright awarded T-Mob with Judgment, not both sides. On this case involving whichever specific patents, those wont be going to trial. Hopefully keep our fingers crossed other patent cases are still alive. I believe Judge Starr still has another VPLM case active
Sorry Investor. Unfortunately I'm familiar with Summary Judgements. If awarded for a party, its typically good for that party that asked for it