Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
For the last time, I am not Warp. Your mind has become warped thinking you know who I am. How many different aliases is that you've claimed now? None of them based on reality.
Back to IGNORE.
You misunderstand what I wrote. I suggested using a fake name and email address (made up on the fly) to avoid having your actual name and email address sold to mailing lists, as a way to avoid spam. The website forces you to enter this info in order to view the content. It benefits the website only in this case, not the end user. Since no authentication email is sent in order to listen to the conference, anyone with basic computer security knowledge wouldn't use their own email address in this instance. I also suggested creating a temporary email address for use in these situations, not for routine communication with others and websites where you normally do business.
Only you could twist the intent of the message to mean one has fake credentials and multiple online aliases. Naturally, you are unable to provide any proof. I have been accused by you of being any of up to about half a dozen people. It's all in your mind. Not a shred of proof. NONE
Just like you were going to nail me for ordering pizzas for you. Never did figure out who was doing that, did ya? I guess those Dominos IT guys aren't as good as they claim. Seems there's more to it than capturing an IP address. But I wouldn't expect someone who still uses AOL email to know that.
So you invested because some of us were buying millions of shares, per your earlier post. That's not a good way to invest. Following some here who post on other boards, "BUY BUY BUY!!!" is a recipe for disaster, since every one of those ended up massive losers.
Every individual shareholder is responsible for their own actions. Little boys blame others. Real men see the person responsible in their mirror every day.
Todos Share Update - 2/2/24
No shares issued since update on 12/8/23.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TOMDF/security
New Phase 3 Trial Data Confirm the Uniquely High Efficacy and Good Safety Profile of the R21/Matrix-M™ Malaria Vaccine in African Children
SERUM INSTITUTE OF INDIA PVT. LTD. — February 1, 2024
https://www.seruminstitute.com/press_release_sii_010224.php
• Investigators immunised over 4800 young children in a trial in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Mali and Tanzania and found on average 78% efficacy in the 5–17-month age group over the first year
• To date 25 million doses manufactured and ready for roll-out by The Serum Institute of India (SII) in the next three to four months
Phase 3 Trial data results of The R21/Matrix-M™ vaccine developed by Oxford University and Serum Institute of India Pvt Ltd, leveraging Novavax’s Matrix-M™ adjuvant has confirmed high efficacy and supported regulatory approvals and licensure in several African countries. The R21/Matrix-M™ vaccine was designed in 2011 as a potential improvement on the RTS, S/AS01 malaria vaccine designed in the 1980s. A phase II trial in Burkina Faso, reporting in 2021, was the first to show that R21/Matrix-M™ could reach the WHO-specified target of 75% efficacy in African children. Recent WHO endorsement will lead to the initial rollout of R21/Matrix-M™ in the coming months. The new results are published in The Lancet today.
The trial investigators immunised over 4800 young children in a trial in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Mali and Tanzania and found on average 78% vaccine efficacy over the first year of follow-up across all sites in the 5-17-month-old age group, the age range group which is studied for most malaria vaccines. Efficacy over this period was broadly similar across sites and in different transmission settings. Safety data from the trial have been reassuring with no serious adverse events linked to immunisation. No other vaccine has reported over 55% efficacy in the same age group. A booster dose at a year maintained good efficacy over the following 6-12 months. The vaccine also reduced infection rates in children measured at 12 and 18 months after vaccination suggesting a potentially beneficial effect in reducing malaria transmission.
R21/Matrix-M™ vaccine was well tolerated, with injection site pain and fever as the most frequent adverse events. Number of adverse events of special interest and serious adverse events did not significantly differ between the vaccine groups. There were no treatment-related deaths.
Malaria is the largest cause of death in young African children with over 600,000 deaths globally each year. Two vaccines have recently achieved and completed World Health Organization (WHO) prequalification and initial deployments are starting early this year.
Professor Adrian Hill, chief investigator of the R21/Matrix-M™ phase 3 trial said "The continued high efficacy of this new vaccine in field trials is very encouraging, and consistent with the high efficacy and excellent durability observed in a smaller four-year phase IIb trial. These data support an important role for the unique high-density nanoparticle display, of the conserved repeat region of the malaria parasite circumsporozoite protein, a feature in the design of the R21 vaccine, in providing such high vaccine efficacy and, thereby, an important new tool for malaria control".
Significantly increased immune responses to the R21/Matrix-M™ vaccine and slightly higher vaccine efficacy were observed in 5-17-month-olds compared to 18-36-month-olds malaria vaccines, supporting planned vaccine deployment initially from 5 months of age in young African children.
The vaccine is licensed to the Serum Institute of India (SII), the world’s largest vaccine manufacturer and a long-term partner of the University of Oxford. This is critical because vaccinating those at high risk of malaria will be important in stemming the spread of the disease, as well as protecting the vaccinated. Matrix-M™ adjuvant is manufactured by Novavax AB and provided to Serum Institute of India for formulation into the final vaccine drug product.
Adar Poonawalla, CEO, Serum Institute of India, said: "The Lancet study on R21/Matrix-M™ Phase 3 trials mark a significant advancement in our battle against this global threat. Our collaboration with the University of Oxford has been instrumental in developing the R21/Matrix-M™ malaria vaccine. We are dedicated to making this vaccine available, especially in Africa, where malaria poses a substantial threat to millions of lives, bringing us closer to a malaria-free world".
Professor Alassane Dicko, Principal Investigator in Mali of the R21/Matrix-M™ vaccine, said: "It has been very exciting to generate high efficacy data with the new R21/Matrix-M™ vaccine so quickly. I predict that this vaccine should be very impactful in preventing malaria deaths in African children".
John C Jacobs, CEO of Novavax commented "Approximately 1,300 children die from malaria every day, a staggering statistic for a preventable disease. The R21/Matrix-M™ Phase 3 efficacy data published in The Lancet reinforce the potential of R21/Matrix-M™ vaccine to protect children against this disease. We are proud of the role of Novavax's patented saponin-based Matrix-M™ adjuvant, which has been demonstrated to enhance the immune response, in the outcome of this clinical trial and are eager to see the realized impact of the vaccine when it is rolled out globally".
Congrats again on your 1.2 cent share price at exit. Now invest those proceeds in another stock, and show us on that board how much money you made with your investment savvy. I'm predicting that won't happen. It's too easy to continue posting here telling shareholders how you threw in the towel and got out. Again, congrats, but seriously, how many times are you going to post that here? There's no mystery about your exit price. The constant reposting here makes us wonder if you need special attention. The words spoken to a child in the movie The Help come to mind...
"You is Kind, You is Smart, You is Important." I suppose someone who never heard those words spoken by others has a strong need to post their own praises for others to read.
I really wish I could believe your words, but they've been broken so many times before it's hard to take them seriously. Everyone knows you are incapable of staying away from this board, just like JP. Gerald Derangement Syndrome is real.
velcro, so who do you blame for your investment decision?
A. Yourself
B. The posters on this board
C. The CEO
D. Someone I haven't listed
Many CEOs use X, even the successful ones. Many investment boards have posters who believe in the company they're invested in and what they're trying to accomplish. Then there are those who lose money on an investment and a decade later are still crying about it on message boards.
Most investors should stick to mutual funds. I'm absolutely convinced of that.
You should care about your own $$$$$ and not mine or any other investor here. Those who take sizable investments in high-risk stocks like Todos understand we may lose. That's our choice. Seems that's hard for you to accept. Why is that?
Only the snowflakes here would be insulted. Congratulations!
I posted my buys after you and others claimed we "supposedly" bought or "claimed" to have bought shares. So we post we are adding shares, and are either straightforward accused of lying, or not offering proof. So we offer proof and now are accused of bragging. And later accused of working for Todos as shills.
Talk about LAUGHABLE. Look in the mirror.
Congrats, you bailed at 1.2 cents. Those who continued to buy still believe long term the game isn't over, although it appears to many to be over. We aren't willing to throw in the towel yet and we don't post we made a mistake. I understand you and many others here are incapable of accepting anything that differs from your own opinion. Now you're talking of being a man? LMAO. Your definition of what a man is seems to be very limited in scope. When I decide to try to unload my shares or accept the loss and write off the taxable portion of my shares, I'll post here. I'm sure the other shareholders will as well.
I never realized that when we post our purchases, we are unwittingly causing others to buy shares as well, and are now getting blamed for leading folks astray. I was raised to believe a person is responsible for their own actions and their decisions to invest their own money are their own. No one else handed me their money and told me to invest it for them. Scratching my head as to why some believe those of us who invested our own money here are now responsible for others who invested their money here. Been trying to figure it out, and came to the following conclusion.
Society has created an atmosphere where no one is held responsible for their actions, where those who call themselves men deflect responsibility and find others to blame. We have safe rooms and crying rooms in colleges, we have DEI initiatives in the workplace so those with mediocre talent and abilities can get hired ahead of those more deserving. We have names for these individuals that blame others and cannot accept responsibility for their own actions.
Snowflake is a derogatory slang term for a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are overly emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions. — Wikipedia
I also checked for hidden messages in your post by holding a UV lamp close to the screen and nothing else appeared except what you wrote.
You forgot the part about the cheerleaders kept buying shares as well. That should provide a clue, but I doubt most here will understand.
CEO posting on X this morning regarding Tollovid availability. For those who ordered and have not received product, you always have the option to request refund via the debit or credit card used to place your order. I would suggest that over being frustrated from lack of shipment and not knowing when it will be available.
Tollovid continues to be available through Fullscript.com last time I checked, but you have to get a doctor's referral. Redspeed can provide more info on this since he has purchased Tollovid there.
I don't see a reverse split accomplishing anything at this point. It doesn't create any value for the stock unless it's tied to an uplist, and there's no way that's an option given the current environment. Those of us who use Tollovid know it works, and those Long Covid programs that use it knows it works. If there was adequate funding for a larger hospitalized trial, Tollovir would save thousands of lives.
Cuomo is bringing Long Covid to everyone's attention. Although the situation looks dire at the moment, one break is all that is needed to turn this ship around. Perhaps that will come, or not. GC shouldn't just reach out to Cuomo, he should probably go to see him directly and show him the program that is using Tollovid and get him to try it. Imagine what might happen to available funding if Cuomo told his listeners about his personal experience using Tollovid.
I'm really going to push this angle with GC. Communicating with Cuomo via X isn't going to get it done, IMO.
I reviewed GC's posts on X since my last update. Lots of engagement with discussions of Covid/Long Covid that I won't get into. Below are the posts I feel describe impact on the company. I have emailed GC tonight asking for an update on the insolvency hearing and if the court accepted the reorganization plan proposed by the company, or if a press release would be forthcoming with an update. I'll let everyone know if he responds. I'm still holding all my shares.
The recovery of funds in litigation from Todos clients would be more than enough to resolve the payments owed the former CEO and 3CL Pharma. The court may or may not take that into account, but from what I've read on Israeli insolvency procedures, their goal is to try to keep the company operational while working out a viable solution for all parties involved. I'm not giving up, and millions of shares are continuing to trade daily, which raises the question of who is buying and selling shares? It's clearly not dilution by the company. I'm with other investors just waiting for an update.
Moon_boy, you are full of crap. None of that is true. I'm a better speller than Red. LOL
I have no idea what post you are referring to with the edits you claim, but Red and I are separate investors and posters. If you want to join the JP clown posse with baseless claims, I'll simply add you to my ignore list as I've done with JP. Life is much better without JP's rhetoric.
And by the way, I respond to some of my own posts all the time... as when continuing a thread of information, or when updating weekly share count. This is nothing new. Red and others have done the same.
Novavax Stock May Soar 379% — The Motley Fool
https://www.fool.com/investing/2024/01/23/novavax-may-soar-379-wall-street-says/
Todos Share Update - 1/19/24
No shares issued since update on 12/8/23.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TOMDF/security
Link to U.S. Senate Committee Addressing Long Covid (currently in progress, includes video link)
https://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/addressing-long-covid-advancing-research-and-improving-patient-care
Todos Share Update - 1/12/24
No shares issued since update on 12/8/23.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TOMDF/security
Full transcript of Novavax at 42nd J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference available at Seeking Alpha.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4661979-novavax-inc-nvax-ceo-john-jacobs-presents-jpmorgan-42nd-annual-healthcare-conference
Novavax: Creating tomorrow’s vaccines today
pharmaphorum
January 10, 2024
https://pharmaphorum.com/rd/novavax-creating-tomorrows-vaccines-today
Back in November 2023, pharmaphorum travelled to Uppsala, Sweden, for a Novavax press conference, the company celebrating a decade of doing what it does best: vaccines. From COVID-19 to malaria, Novavax focuses solely on developing vaccines against some of the world’s most serious infectious threats. What sets it apart, though, is that its vaccines are protein-based.
Founded in 1987 in the US, Gale Smith – VP of vaccine development at Novavax – invented the technique of using insect cells for producing recombinant protein vaccines. A further milestone came in 1998 in Uppsala, with the development of adjuvants for veterinary use and for humans after that. By 2013, European Novavax AB was acquired by the US Novavax Inc, combining the two techniques of recombinant proteins and S-based adjuvants, Magnus Savenhed, managing director of Novavax AB, told journalists.
Creating immunological memory without causing disease
Before a tour of the facility, Dirk Poelaert, MD and senior director of medical affairs in Europe for Novavax, who has worked in vaccines for 20 years or so, explained that protein-based vaccines work, very simply, by protecting humans by triggering the immune system to produce antibodies against a specific pathogen, making a person sick and mimicking nature by providing an antigen. “In short, vaccines create immunological memory without causing disease,” he said.
Nonetheless, recombinant protein vaccines often need an adjuvant, or a substance that increases or modulates the immune response to a vaccine. This is why the Novavax vaccine platform comprises a recombinant protein particle plus Matrix-M adjuvant, which is manufactured in Uppsala itself.
Poelaert described how a recombinant protein particle has a native 3-dimensional conformation, with truncated S. frugiperda glycans and a particulate structure that facilitates antigen presentation and processing. Meanwhile, the Matrix-M adjuvant induces robust neutralising antibodies and induces polyfunctional CD4+TH1 lymphocytes (T helper cells). Formulation is in a nanoparticle with the recombinant protein particle.
Protein-based vaccines and recombinant expression systems
What might not be realised is that protein-based vaccines have existed for many decades for the prophylaxis of bacterial and viral diseases. They are indicated across the spectrum of infants, children, and adults, and have a favourable safety profile with well-known benefits. Nevertheless, originally the proteins used in vaccines were purified exclusively from cultures of an infectious agent, while today, specific immunogenic proteins can be generated through recombinant expression systems, said Poelaert.
Novavax takes the RNA sequence that codes and then incorporates into a baculovirus that can only infect insects, not humans. It uses the Sf9 cell, an ovary cell of an army moth, and the baculovirus enters the insect cell, including its nucleus, wherein it releases its genetic material. The machinery of this cell will produce the original protein had in mind, which then rises to the surface of the cell, where it is harvested and put into contact with the core, the polysorbate 80, the emulsifiers, and go towards a full vaccine.
Global public health: The malaria case
In terms of the global context, also in attendance was Dr Ole Olesen, PhD, executive director of the European Vaccine Initiative (EVI). EVI is an independent, non-profit research organisation that supports the development of safe and effective vaccines for global health – including affordability. It supports vaccine R&D through pre-clinical and clinical development, having helped with over 40 vaccine formulations. Dr Olesen noted how infectious diseases are often forgotten in the Western world.
“However, in the poorer parts of the world, infectious diseases are still a huge problem,” he reminded journalists. “More than 10 million people each year die from such. If one looks specifically at the malaria example, there are almost 250 million cases per year […] As a global community, this needs to be addressed.” Indeed, in 2022, there were 608,000 deaths from malaria across 85 countries worldwide.
As of December 2023, though, Novavax’s R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine received pre-qualification from the World Health Organization (WHO), to prevent malarial disease in children caused by the P. falciparum parasite in endemic areas, allowing United Nations (UN) agencies to procure the vaccine in eligible countries and enable rollout of the vaccine.
The power of partnerships (and adjuvants)
Developed by the University of Oxford and the Serum Institute of India using Novavax’ saponin-based Matrix-M adjuvant – which helps stimulate immune responses to the vaccine – the R21/Matrix-M malaria vaccine has gained authorisation for use in children in Burkina Faso, Ghana, and Nigeria. Meanwhile, R21/Matrix-M is one of several ongoing collaborations involving Novavax’s adjuvant technology, with additional research in malaria and other infectious diseases in both humans and animals.
“In an ideal world, the disease burden should match the amount of research investment going into solving them,” he continued. “Malaria has, though, an enormous discrepancy between the disease burden and the amount of global investment. It costs over $500 million to develop a new vaccine, though; it is expensive, and this is a conservative figure. Some other projections are four or five times that amount. Clearly, it’s an expensive business. Additionally, there is a complexity to the disease itself […], and malaria has taken almost 150 years to get to the point now where there is a potential vaccine.”
“The immune system is like a sleeping dog,” Dr Olesen said. “Non-vaccinated, [it] remains asleep; immunised with active ingredient only, it remains in semi-dormancy. It is only when immunised with an active ingredient adjuvant that the dog is alive and kicking (and barking and biting, as one’s immune system should in the face of the infection). Companies like Novavax, with unique technologies like the Matrix-M adjuvant (the difference between a vaccine that works and doesn’t) need to engage in solving global health problems, a critical mass coming together, [and] the R21 malaria vaccine is an example of this, indeed.”
The pandemic period
During the pandemic, Novavax was operating under a joint contract with the EU Commission, delivering the vaccine through that (which came to an end at the close of 2023) to different governments around the world. Now, the company has initiated a transition into a “new and normal commercial situation in Europe,” Jorgen Persson, VP of market access and customer engagement, told journalists.
In different countries, governments are still considering their management of the vaccine post-pandemic, and so Novavax is in discussions with those governments. There is, Persson said, a dialogue from the perspective of delivering an updated vaccine that covers the needs of the space as it is now. The vaccine is approved in over 40 countries and recommended by the WHO. Well-positioned with proven technology, pipeline assets, commercial execution, and a focus on corporate development, Novavax’s platform seems to stand it in good stead for its desired future.
The value of vaccines
Previously, pharmaphorum had spoken with Alvar Paz, general manager for Europe at Novavax, and Silvia Taylor, executive vice president and chief corporate affairs and advocacy officer for Novavax, at the Economist Impact Future of Health Europe Summit in London. Taylor later partook in a fireside chat at the conference with Michael Guterbock on the value and power of vaccines.
Taylor joined Novavax in June 2020, right as the pandemic was hitting. In the time since, she’s helped to build the company from a very small, development-stage company to a global commercial organisation with authorisations around the world and commercial operations and manufacturing in Europe. Paz, meanwhile, joined Novavax two years later, in June 2022.
When it comes to public health, education is key, insisted Taylor: the availability, the choice, the options of vaccines. It's about trust. And Novavax hopes to be among the first companies to commercialise a combination vaccine (COVID and influenza).
“That's almost the holy grail, right?” she said. “If you think about it, it's two seasonal vaccines given in one jab. I think the convenience and the adherence to vaccination will greatly improve when you do combination products like this, but that is a few years away. We're still in phase two, and so I think we've got a couple of years more of our clinical development before we go to that.”
“I think the uniqueness of what Novavax is bringing to market is that we're the only protein-based option,” she continued. “It has advantages in terms of not needing to be frozen, it's refrigerator stable. I think, speaking to demand, you've got the consumer demand, you've also got the healthcare providers who have to administer. It's a really attractive profile.”
Remembering that COVID isn’t ‘done’
In October 2023, Novavax was given the go-ahead by regulators in the US for an updated version of its COVID-19 vaccine, which targets the XBB.1.5 variant of the coronavirus.
“COVID isn't done with us. It continues [and] it continues to change,” explained Taylor. “It continues to be something that we see a need for. In fact, in markets like the US, the recommendations are even broader than what we see in Europe in terms of giving accessibility to everybody in the market to get vaccinated as they choose. We think that's a great model. It's not the way it is here in Europe.”
“When you're talking about infectious diseases, you're not just vaccinating yourself for yourself, you're doing it for your community, you're doing it for your country,” she added. “You literally see things spreading. What we say about, "Nobody is safe until everybody is safe," is very, very much true.”
“We should be grateful to the mRNA vaccine, which is a pandemic vaccine, but ours is the endemic vaccine,” Paz noted. “A protein-based vaccine has proven the features that much better fit an endemic situation, [including] supply stability, temperature stability, even the product features themselves: efficacy, longer duration and durability, and safety profile.”
The press conference in Sweden might have been missing the Scandinavian summer light, but it appears that the light of vaccine-protective hope is burning brightly at Novavax, from COVID to malaria, and beyond.
Virtual webcast link to 42nd Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference NVAX. Definitely worth a listen. Bright future for Novavax with clear focus on cutting unnecessary expenses and growing business.
https://ir.novavax.com/events?year=2024&month=1#nav
Click on Virtual webcast link, which redirects you to J.P. Morgan website. Enter info to access webcast. Recommend opt-out of info sharing, or enter made-up data (for those who prefer not to have to provide personal info) as no email confirmation is required to access the webcast.
Novavax: Implied upside of 600% - The Motley Fool
3 Turnaround Stocks With 151% to 600% Upside in 2024, According to Select Wall Street Analysts
Sean Williams, The Motley Fool
Tue, January 9, 2024, 5:21 AM EST
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/3-turnaround-stocks-151-600-102100466.html
Novavax: Implied upside of 600%
The comeback story of the year, at least based on the price target of one Wall Street analyst, may be biotech stock Novavax (NASDAQ: NVAX). Despite tumbling more than 98% from its all-time high, H.C. Wainwright analyst Vernon Bernardino foresees shares of Novavax catapulting to $35. This would represent a 600% increase from the $5 shares closed at on Jan. 5.
Perhaps the biggest pendulum swing for Novavax is pending arbitration concerning orders for its COVID-19 vaccine with Gavi, a nongovernmental global vaccine organization. Gavi is seeking $700 million following the cancellation of a contract with Novavax for 350 million doses of its COVID-19 vaccine.
If Novavax owes nothing, its financial foundation would be greatly improved. Meanwhile, if it has to pay $700 million to Gavi, its ability to continue as a solvent company may come into question.
Cost-cutting is another big catalyst in 2024 for Novavax. The company practically halved its operating expenses through the first nine months of 2023 -- a $950 million reduction when compared to the comparable period in 2022 -- and has plans to slash another $300 million in full-year costs in the new year. If Novavax can meet these aggressive cost-cutting goals, it should meaningfully reduce its rate of cash burn.
The other wild card here is figuring out what happens with COVID-19 vaccine demand. Novavax used traditional methods to develop a protein-based vaccine, which is markedly different than the messenger-RNA vaccines developed by Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech. If Novavax were to see stronger demand for its COVID-19 vaccine, or gather momentum as it kicks off late-stage studies for a combination vaccine (influenza and COVID-19), it's possible shares could enjoy significant upside in the new year.
While I'm not nearly as bullish on Novavax as Bernardino, a triple-digit gain could be in the cards in 2024 if things fall Novavax's way.
New, highly mutated COVID variants ‘Pirola’ BA.2.86 and JN.1 may cause more severe disease, new studies suggest
Fortune
January 8, 2024
https://fortune.com/well/2024/01/08/covid-omicron-variants-pirola-ba286-jn1-more-severe-disease-lung-gi-tract-symptoms/amp/
“We cannot ignore the evidence that Omicron may be evolving into a more severe form of itself", one researcher told Fortune.
Highly mutated COVID variant BA.2.86—close ancestor of globally dominant “Pirola” JN.1—may lead to more severe disease than other Omicron variants, according to two new studies published Monday in the journal Cell.
In one study, researchers from Ohio State University performed a variety of experiments using a BA.2.86 pseudovirus—a lab-created version that isn’t infectious. They found that BA.2.86 can fuse to human cells more efficiently and infect cells that line the lower lung—traits that may make it more similar to initial, pre-Omicron strains that were more deadly.
In the other study, researchers in Germany and France came to the same conclusion. “BA.2.86 has regained a trait characteristic of early SARS-CoV-2 lineages: robust lung cell entry,” the authors wrote. The variant “might constitute an elevated health threat as compared to previous Omicron sublineages,” they added.
While illness caused by the initial Omicron strain was typically considered more mild than that caused by earlier variants, it’s impossible to say definitively, experts say. That’s because those sickened by Omicron had generally already been infected with an earlier version of the virus, likely softening the blow. Additionally, many had been vaccinated, to the same effect.
Still, Omicron had a penchant for infecting the upper airway versus the lower airway, where prior versions of the virus tended to accumulate, causing more severe disease. The new studies offer proof that this trend may very well be reversing, the authors contend. If true, it’s bad news for those who hoped the virus was slowly attenuating to the equivalent of a common cold.
“We cannot ignore the evidence” that Omicron may be evolving into a more severe form of itself, Dr. Shan-Lu Liu—professor and co-director of the Viruses and Emerging Pathogens Program at Ohio State University, and lead author on the first study—told Fortune.
Increasing COVID hospitalizations in the U.S. and around the globe potentially bolster the argument, he added.
It’s tough to tell if disease caused by COVID is again becoming more severe because waning immunity muddles matters, experts say. Antibody immunity to COVID from vaccination or prior infection—which can reduce the severity of the disease or prevent infection altogether—declines after three to six months. Globally, uptake of the latest COVID booster, released this past fall, leaves much to be desired. In the U.S., it sits under 20%, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In theory, the longer it’s been since someone was infected with COVID or received a booster, the greater their risk for severe outcomes like hospitalization and death.
Is JN.1 more severe than Omicron?
As for what the studies might mean regarding the severity of JN.1 infection, the jury is still out. But the new findings—combined with expert speculation that JN.1 may be showing a preference for infecting the GI tract—warrant more study into the evolving nature of the virus, according to Liu.
Another concern of his: the possibility of COVID recombining with another coronavirus in animals, then transitioning back over to humans—throwing another viral plot twist into the pandemic’s narrative.
Some experts contend that Omicron—highly mutated compared to previous strains—originated in animals, then spilled back over into humans (as opposed to developing in a human with a long-term infection, as others contend). Regardless, animals serve as an underappreciated wild card, Liu contends. Case in point: Many of Ohio’s white-tailed deer have tested positive for COVID, affording the virus an additional population in which to mutate.
Another, perhaps larger concern of Liu: the possibility that COVID recombines with another, more deadly coronavirus like SARS or MERS, which had case fatality rates around 10% and 34%, respectively. In contrast, COVID’s case fatality rate, among unvaccinated Americans, sat around 1% prior to Omicron, and around 0.11% after.
“Anything can happen,” Liu said. “It’s really hard to predict what’s going to come next, but nature can do amazing things.”
The bottom line when it comes to the power of animals to further evolve the virus and send another curveball flying humanity’s way: “Humans, watch out.”
Novavax Investor Presentation for J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference
Filed today as part of 8-K SEC filing.
LINK: Presentation
Todos Share Update - 1/5/24
No shares issued since update on 12/8/23.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TOMDF/security
How many times did I recommend you SELL your Todos shares since you were so miserable being an investor? Many times.
How many time did I recommend you BUY Todos shares? ZERO
I hate to burst your bubble, but me buying Todos shares isn't an invitation for others to buy. In your fantasy world of laying blame on others, I guess it seems that way. Wake up!
Please tell us about all the other penny stocks you've been invested in that got traditional business loan financing from all the plethora of financial institutions willing to make those loans to a high-risk OTC company, vs. the number of financial institutions lined up to make toxic loans to high-risk OTC companies needing cash to fund operations and business goals to try to reach profitability one day. You and others posting here sound like experts, so show us some examples of how similar OTC companies comparable to Todos and Amarantus did it without toxic lending involved.
I have my reasons for investing here. I've stated many times it may not work out. I'm still holding to see what unfolds. My decision. Blaming GC is pathetically immature when you had the choice to sell and minimize your losses and chose not to sell. No one loves a crybaby who can't accept any responsibility for their decisions... except on this board with the clown posse blaming everyone but themselves.
Todos Share Update - 12/29/23
No shares issued since update on 12/8/23.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/TOMDF/security
No one posting here is fleecing anyone. If someone posts they bought shares, and especially if they provided proof, and they're telling other readers that they understand the risk and are being ridiculed by the clown posse that posts here, it's not fleecing. How is that encouraging anyone else to buy shares? If you're buying shares solely because someone else here is buying, you really need to stick to mutual funds or a simple savings account with your money.
I have to answer to no one except myself. I won't be crying here for a decade if I lose my investment. Can't say that for most here that aren't current shareholders.
I took my Tollovid today.
GC hasn't posted anything on X about the news release. Sorry, just returned from a trip, and was hoping something was there.