Volume!
Interesting first hour and half, it has already trade 73M shares.
Have to wonder if the company knows something.

Interesting update posted on Discord

My gut says FINRA has been advancing the review. Could be getting close.

A FINRA approval and an update on new projects coming in for investors would move the stock to its next level.

Interesting Renewal Fuels information from someone with your background.

By the way I have been using a different AI to help me with this, and I confirmed much of it with other sources. I am not a fusion/nuclear scientist, though I am in the technical felids of electronics, Industrial electronic controls and electrical distribution.

Is it possible that this one is over your head, given your research only comes from AI?

The one thing I've learned about using AI is you have to know what questions to ask. The other thing I've learned is that AI isn't always right given it is limited to how it learns as it goes. Perhaps in time, it will be AI that solves this problem.

Now that I understand your background, I have a better understanding of your lack of knowledge when it comes to real estate development or how a company can take a OTC shell and turn it around into a FINRA approval.

I agree with you.

Time will tell.

I'm also looking for the Q value to confirm where this falls.

That said, I find it interesting that they are laying this out under the patents to build out their claims the way they are. I for one will continue to watch from afar to see if this has the ability to meet the claims of a 100MW.

Given the stock’s prior ties to Costello, it’s a huge red flag and why I need to see either an LOI or MOU proving they have a path to revenues. The OTC is full of scams with claims of technology that isn’t real—a trick as old as time.

I found this interesting in the OTC press release that makes one think.

I’m beginning to see why this stock is in its current price position. It seems the soup isn’t quite ready just yet.

Based on what I've reviewed so far, this is definitely one to follow.

REALLY!

Not my first rodeo.

While I’ve been involved in other RMs, I have first-hand with two where I was fortunate enough to make seven figures, and they didn’t have to post to Edgar missing financials to finalize the name change. Don’t get me wrong—I would have loved to see the prior financials to understand why one of the companies claimed the records simply weren’t available, especially given how poorly the previous management had run things.

Meaning one of the companies spent close to two years getting the name changed and "audited" financials when the prior records didn't exist.

If you think the missing financials are the key piece, you might want to stick with your day job!

Once again, you're either lacking an understanding of the FINRA requirements or you're simply trying to mislead new GRLT investors here.

If you're trying to imply that FINRA requires "audited" financial records for a name change under the RM, you would be wrong.

FINRA reviews corporate actions (including name changes, ticker changes, reverse splits, and reverse mergers) under FINRA Rule 6490, which focuses on:
• Properly executed corporate documents
• Board and shareholder approvals
• State-filed amendments
• CUSIP confirmation
• Merger or reorganization agreements
• Payment of applicable fees

None of the required items include audited financials.
This is supported by corporate-action guidance showing the required documents: board resolutions, shareholder consents, articles of amendment, CUSIP letters, and merger agreements — not audits.

Audits become relevant only when:
• The company is preparing to uplist (OTCQB, Nasdaq, etc.)
• The company is preparing SEC filings (e.g., Form 10, S-1)
• The company wants to regain or maintain “current information” status
Example: Renewal Fuels (RNWF) filed a name change with FINRA while separately working on PCAOB audits for other regulatory goals — but the audit was not a requirement for the name change itself.

What was it on that other stock we are both in? If I remember correctly, wasn't it a year to clean up the financial records and get the FINRA approval?

The good news is that the company actually understands that it needs to clean up the past management records.

All in good time! Something Mr. T seems to have plenty of. Ten years on the same message board—that has to be a record.

OH yes Kemosabe!

Bradshaw came out this week with a forecast of $357 on spot.

Check out the latest margin spread—the Comex (paper market) is on the brink of collapse, creating opportunities for mining stocks. The past 12 months have been wild, especially with China locking down its exports on January 1st.

Considering the balance between industrial demand and supply, coupled with the rising tensions, silver seems poised to back up his forecast.

https://contrariancapitalist.substack.com/p/tom-bradshaw-silver-to-375-gold-to

Until BK can find its Silver Bullet, I'll remain neutral here.

Something tells me that may be a smart move.

Something just doesn't smell right with this one. Been watching it for a couple of weeks and the technology just doesn't add up.

Maybe I'm wrong, but based on what I've seen to date, this feels more like a scam. Just haven't posted anything since I'm still digging into it.
Good luck with your exit.

Hey old man!

You missed my key point!

You continue to live in the past and can't understand the mindset of what successful people do.

Given you claim to have no background on actually building a company or developing commercial real estate, I totally appreciate your lack of understanding.

LOL

No surprise! There is no liquidity and will not be for some time IMO.

I'm a silver stacker and have been enjoying the silver market over the last year and see the potential for spot at over $300, so I'll stay neutral for now on BK. Hell, what else are we going to do?

I’m only neutral due to the share structure and the audited financials. Beyond that, the new kid will need to prove how they plan to close on the pending MOU in March, unless there’s news about a diaper deal.

My morning laugh!

I always find it entertaining when a “retired” poster hangs out in a chat room for over 10 years, claiming to know more about FINRA rules than those who work with them professionally. Just look at what Johnney has delivered to his members and investors in development projects, and it’s clear he’s a problem solver.

Successful developers or GPs are uncommon in today's world. Instead of responding to challenges with "it can't be done," they focus on finding the right people to solve the problem.

Johnney will clear the related FINRA approval. How do I know? Just check out the development company's proven ROI to date. That alone tells any savvy businessperson everything they need to know.

How do I know these things, because I've walked in his shoes for over 40-years and understand better than most what Johnney is dealing with on a daily bases, unlike Mr. T.

Heads or tails?

It's difficult to judge. George has put effort into organizing the books and finances, but we haven't had revenue proof in three years. That's not impressive.

Shareholders need to remember that he has put a lot of time and energy into the company with no real compensation. Does it surprise me that he is passing on the CEO position....NO!

Any effective CEO recognizes their own strengths and limitations. I believe George knows this and has brought in Sufan to take over.

I'm interested in Mr. Sufan's background, as I don't see a clear link to the BK business model. This raises questions about George assigning him the task—it seems he may have been chosen simply because he was a director and few others were interested.

One possible reason for Mr. Sufan's presence at the table is that BK may be collaborating with an alternative supply chain to develop its products. For instance, given current challenges within China’s, the company may seek other options to avoid overreliance on that market. With Mr. Sufan’s connections, new opportunities may arise that were previously unavailable to George.

Bottom line, the jury is still out.

Little background work:

Sufan Siauw has been a director of Megola/Breakthrough. Which begs the question, why leave Vionx or Lithium and go to work full time at BK given its lack of revenues?

Profile

Sufan Siauw is the founder of Vionx Energy Corp., Office General, Inc. Current jobs include Director at Imagine Lithium, Inc. since 2025, Managing Director at Interway International Ltd., President at Haining Paul Yuan Dyestuff Co., Ltd., and Chief Technology Officer & Managing Partner at Dalian Bingshan H2O3 Environmental Solutions Co., Ltd. since 2010.

It is also noteworthy that Lithium stock was up 16% today and 40% in the last five days. Looks like a deeper dive may be in order to learn why a guy with energy ties has such an interest in BK.

Given BK just closed on the purchase, Siauw would appear to see more than the shareholders are seeing. JMO

Not what I'm finding.

https://discord.com/channels/934155795304706120/1437880223982157974/1458982349067915450



I always find it interesting when chat room posters believe they can direct a CEO of ANY company. At the end of the day, the CEO has a much better knowledge of what the company is dealing with and the day to day changes that happen in the development of a business. The only thing I see here is a development company with a track record that speaks volumes in todays world.

If you're looking for a quick flip, you're not going to find it here.

The Winner update we have been waiting for will break tomorrow:

Internal restructuring at Winner is basically code for the company facing financial problems. Anyone who followed what happened to Chinese companies when Trump imposed tariffs will understand this “restructuring,” especially if they saw the videos coming out of China showing the impact, which they’re probably still dealing with even now.

That said, the update suggests that Winner is back in play now that tariff issues for Chinese companies are better understood, along with a clearer picture of the shipping delays caused by recent market changes.

The good news: this update would tell me the pilot program was successful and that it actually has legs.

Bottom line, we WAIT!

Bashing is a good thing. It helps keep a balance to the pumpers.

Given my background, this is where Mr. T falls short—he doesn’t seem to grasp how sponsored real estate works or the value the platform adds to the industry. He’s missing the bigger picture of how this model benefits investors and what’s happening in real time. While he focuses on the history, or as he calls it, the lack of fees generated for GRLT, he’s overlooking how the platform is changing the way investors can participate in commercial projects. Tokenized real estate has its pros and cons, but the tokenized commercial properties being developed here offer opportunities that current LLC membership or TIC ownership structures simply can’t match.

While the $1.9M investor funds raised over the last two weeks is a strong support of what the company is building, it shows investors a positive outcome to offset the claims that Johnney doesn't know what he is doing.

One of the biggest advantages that many people don’t realize is the ability to invest in these projects, unlike traditional ones where you might be tied up for five to ten or more years with no real way to cash out without taking a loss.

As for the "basher", it's what I call noise by those seeking attention with a lack of knowledge as to how commercial real estate works.

Good call!

Personally, I've been neutral on the stock since the platform lunched. They need to show the offerings are being filled and how quickly they are filled.

As a GP and sponsor of commercial projects, I first needed to see how the offerings are progressing. While $1.9M isn’t much in my world, the fact that a start-up tokenized platform managed to raise this amount during the “holidays,” with everything else happening in my world right now, only reinforces the direction things are heading.

If you're wondering, why we are seeing an uptick in the price.

Look no further than the update on the company website. This is how you measure success.

Check the 11:16 AM post today with the Gaia investor update:
https://discord.com/channels/934155795304706120/969278434578665502

$1.9M raised in just the first two weeks of the platform up and running.
So much for the claims of a scam company. The train is about to leave the station.

They are too busy pushing down the other OTC runner.

I for one have to agree with them on the stock and can't find how a three-year-old patent can take a penny stock to $0.04.
One doesn't have to dig too deep to find that it has more questions than answers. But that's just me talking!

Interesting update today which might explain why we saw todays support.

We hear your concerns but do not worry as we will offer RegCF securities in the future like we've done in the past that will open it up to non accredited investors in the US! For US residents looking to invest in reg D offerings there are ways to get accredited investor status…

— Primior Holding (OTCMKT:GRLT) (@Primior) December 31, 2025

This is what will pay the bills and provide the much-needed valuation support.


Something tells me we are about to see some of the old gang coming back to this chat room as the shine starts to wear off on the other meaningless OTC runner.

You boys need to get a room. 😂

Happy New Year to the chatroom and the Break team.

In a word, no!

While the name change is important, it does not pay the bills.

The real catalyst will be how quickly they can fill their project offerings. That said, seeing them attract overseas investors through the new ad efforts rolling out this week should start giving shareholders some insight. Now that the platform is live, shareholders will likely shift their focus to the revenue stream.

I also find it interesting that Johnney keeps posting the new trading symbol as if it is close or in place for the live platform.

Correct, I guess that is what happens when you feel you have a stronger balance sheet. 😎

I was a little surprised that they didn't sell the entire rights on the product. That was a nice surprise as well.
That said, we still haven't heard the outcome of the last LOI, or did I miss something?

Still waiting for that purchase order.

Didn't see that one coming.

UPDATE: Breakthrough Chemistry Inc (BKTH) has retired 12,500 Preferred Series D shares returned by GS Capital Blends LLC, removing 125M common‑share equivalents from potential dilution.

Company Position and Impact on Capital Structure:
-Reduces the fully diluted share exposure…

— BREAKTHROUGH CHEMISTRY (@megolacorp) December 27, 2025

Found it!
Just need the correct search request.
Systems, Methods and Apparatus of a Fusion Nuclear Reactor

Patent Application Number
• 17/736,084 (U.S. patent application)

Filing Date
• May 3, 2022

Accepted by USPTO
• May 24, 2022

Kepler claims the reactor could:
• Fit in the back of a pickup truck
• Produce 10 megawatts of usable power
(That’s their claim — not validated by independent physics.)

So, yes, they have filed and received a patent back in 2022. Now they just need to prove it works in the real-world application.

I did do a search for a US Patent and found none have been issued or were abandoned.

Anything is possible, but it does raise a number of questions.

I'm not saying it can't be done. However, I can't find any proof based on current science against the facts I posted.

Again, I'm open to learning more on the company's claims, but right now the science doesn't back it up.

Great! Show me the link and I will.

Please prove me wrong. I'm more than interested in REAL facts.

While I'm not a fan of some of the naysayers, here. There does appear to be valid reasoning behind their claims.

In researching the company's claims, I found the following:

The term does NOT appear in any scientific source returned by search. There is no recognized reactor design formally called an “implausible aneutronic reactor.”

Nothing in the search results uses that phrase.
• Not currently feasible
• Not physically realistic with today’s technology
• Aneutronic fusion that requires extreme temperatures or confinement beyond what we can achieve
And that matches the science:

Aneutronic fusion requires much more extreme conditions than standard deuterium–tritium fusion.
For example:
• Proton–boron fusion needs temperatures around 600 million °C, far above what ITER or tokamaks can reach reliably.
• Confinement methods like Polywell, Z-pinch, and dense plasma focus are still experimental.

Aneutronic reactor
This is a real concept.
An aneutronic fusion reactor is a fusion system designed to use fuels that produce very few neutrons, such as:
• Proton–boron-11 (p–B11) fusion
• Deuterium–helium-3 fusion

These reactions release energy mostly as charged particles, not neutrons.
That makes them attractive because:
• Less radioactive damage
• Less shielding needed
• Potential for direct electricity conversion

Implausible
Since no reactor uses this phrase formally, “implausible” is almost certainly being used informally to mean:
• Not currently feasible
• Not physically realistic with today’s technology
• Aneutronic fusion that requires extreme temperatures or confinement beyond what we can achieve

People use “implausible” when referring to:
• Over-optimistic startup claims
• Designs that violate known plasma physics
• Concepts requiring impossible confinement or temperatures
• Sci-fi-level reactors with no experimental support

🧭 Bottom line
There is no official reactor type called an “implausible aneutronic reactor.”

JUST SAYING
After all, it is penny land, trade accordingly.

Here's where this 10-year-old argument starts to fall apart for Mr. T. and the blow hole.

My most successful seven-figure investments were in companies bought out under circumstances similar to GRLT, even when they had incomplete financials or deeper issues—often worse than those Mr. T is highlighting here.

A play I enjoyed had more than a decade of lost records, which the new team was unable to recover. It took almost two-years and two CPA firms before the company could finally present FRINA with audited financial statements. All while the stock was publicly traded.

An important aspect to consider is the connection between the former CEO, whom Mr. T disfavors, and GRLT's financial performance. In most cases I have observed, shell companies were acquired with management transferring control and offering minimal further involvement.

That’s not the case here. If you’re skeptical, simply check the most recent Q filing to see how many common shares the former CEO currently holds and has for some time. Meaning he understands the importance of working with the current team with ALL financial records an prior legal sins to his financial success. A smart play by Johnney that's not discussed here.

A common error made in this community is relying solely on individuals who simply recite SEC regulations and assert that a particular action is not possible.

One aspect I admire in successful GP’s is their capacity to overcome challenges. They approach situations with a solution-oriented mindset, encouraging others not to focus on obstacles, but rather to identify ways to achieve the desired outcome. Meaning they walk into a meeting with a; Don't tell me it can't be done, tell me how to get it done!

As a GP who has developed and managed commercial projects for over 40-years I have a hands-on knowledge of what Johnney and his team is pulling together and I'm not selling stock here to chase some other shinny OTC that is being pumped. Which is some of what we are currently seeing here.

I just have to MARK this post.

I've reviewed the claims made by Mr. T. Experience tells me otherwise.

For starters, the CEO has legal and accounting working on this review. Secondly, it was no small step getting the platform up and running.

From where I stand, I'm going to go out on a limb and say what the company has pulled off is above your pay grade. As well as the gentle who has a friend who owns real estate. LMAO

Scammed?

I’ve seen every kind of scam out there.

In penny land, the most common scenario is a company that issues stocks but fails to deliver shareholders a functional platform. All while management and insiders get rich with their printing press or toxic financing. FUNNY! I haven't seen that here with Grillit, have you?

I’ve had the chance to uncover various scams and worked with the FBI to put more than one CEO and CFO in orange jumpsuits. I’ve also exposed GPs attempting to raise capital to fuel their Ponzi schemes.

Scams, oh, I have a great nose for spotting them. Right now, the only scam I see is the one you're trying to pull off.

What's in a name change?

If I had a dollar for every penny stock that used a name change to hype its value, the world would be a much better place.

For the record, a name change is nothing more than a company cleaning up its business plan. Anyone buying a penny stock with hopes that it was going to support a stock price is only a fool IMO. Given what this company has done to get its platform up and running only shows me that the team clearly understands what its going to take to clean up the company records to obtain its approval.

What the company just pulled off with the platform just trumped your "FINRA approval".

Showing shareholders, a working platform is the path that supports this stocks REAL value going forward. Anyone sitting here watching the day to day stock price is not the real story. Until the company starts showing that the investors "in real time" are stepping up to fill the offerings, this stock is going to get pushed around. But you already know that.

You're correct!

Having the platform in place and cleared to start taking funds is huge. What folks are watching in real time is a sub penny building a business model that has gone from a "what if" to "it's now making bank".

As I’ve been saying since October, they now need to prove they can deliver on the offering. Once that happens, shareholders will start to see how the platform can move from just an idea to a real money-maker.

Old "Blow Hole" is working overtime to try and move the stock down in order to reload. The problem is, he's working overtime and its beginning to show just how desperate he has become.

It's a BIG....BIG day!

One step closer to showing the world that they are ramping up for real revenues.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G8jXDFebMAAGDBO.jpg:large

Nicely done team!

You really should stay in your lane, Mr. I have a friend in the real estate business.

So now you’re an expert on what we in the real estate business call a Ponzi scheme.

While Ponzi schemes are well known in the industry, this investment is tied to just one asset, which the investor will hold under a legal ownership structure. Plus, there’s the oversight of having it regulated under the watchful eye of the SEC. But you already knew that.

I smell something!

I need to check my shoes because someone here is really laying it on thick with a lot of nonsense.