Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
What would you recommend the dress code for going to the moon?
Oh ho !! Keep going up . That's good
My words are as true as magic
No more crappy days from now!
It's a conservatorship syndrome virus
Collins is pretending to be a nuclear bomb which is traveling at the speed of supersonic with 100% accuracy
Agree
Can I see $1 today?
We will go to the moon
Once spspa class action is resolved. Administration can move gses conservatorship to an exit.
I believe so.
Lol
True !!! Fnma commons are not in the same case with Freddie Mac but fnma commons are connected in the same spspa litigation as Freddie therefore fnma commons must get an award too.
$0 damages. !
Lol
Common sense!
To be certified or not to be certified?
To be certified, it will take longer.
Otherwise
It would take less than one day to decertified.
I think the time period to appeal is only 14 days . By August 31 will be expired
The retrial was done. But case isn't over yet. The judge must finalize to certify the jury verdicts. Till then we can go to the moon
award of compensatory damages is the most common of the legal remedies for breach of contract. The calculation of compensatory damages is based on the actual losses you have sustained as a result of nws . They typically fall into two categories: expectation damages and consequential damages.
FHFA violated breach of contract.
If fhfa did not violated breach of contract, what would the pps be.
This pps is 1000% greater than $612 million
I see a cow is flying. This cow must be a holly cow
That's is why Tim Rood said " there's much more to come"
Violations of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing are divided into four parts
1. valid contract
2. duty of good faith and fair dealing
3. breach of implied covenant
4. causation and damage
https://nakaselawfirm.com/san-diego-business-litigation-lawyer-ca-attorney/breach-of-implied-covenant-of-good-faith-and-fair-dealing-law-in-california-breach-of-contract-lawyer/#:~:text=Damages%20for%20breach%20of%20implied,Pet%20(1984)%20162%20Cal.
If black is freed then the brown is freed also
Get your calculator ready
Awesome
On September 28, 2018, the Court issued an order upholding plaintiffs’ claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
The violations of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing were divided into three levels.
Level # 1 is treasury, the first high class with the most powerful government in executive administration.
Level # 2 is the FHFA, the second high class from treasury.
The number one and two are protected by hera.
Level # 3 is f and f corporations , the low class from one and two.
At level # 3 ,it is an easy win for p but at level one and two are much tougher to win. Will p also win at both levels one and two in this retrial?
We will see
If p is winning then it would require so much time to analyze between the lines.
If p is losing then less time is needed to read between the lines.
Fast deliberation vs extra long deliberation
If the deliberation is taking less than one day then the D is winning 99.9999999%.
Otherwise
If the deliberation is taking more than one , or two days then p is winning 99.9999%
Smelling a total victory!
Demarco will go to jail
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2023/08/02/homes/fannie-and-freddie-fitch-downgrade/index.html
Why did Fitch choose to downgrade during retrial of spspa class action?
Which side is Fitch on ?
Fitch action is not being driven by fundamental credit, capital or liquidity deterioration at the firms, but Fitch action was to help government win the spspa class action of this retrial.
Plaintiffs had been chasing the D for over 10 years.
Now the roads ended when supreme court had declared that there's a violation of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Then supreme court sent this case back to Royce Lamberth.
Royce Lamberth must fulfill his duties over this trial as per request from supreme court.
In others words, Royce Lamberth must take an order from supreme court.
is it legal for lamberth to inject his comments against shareholders?
The words "against shareholders" are not legal to use at this time
If you had remembered,the supreme court had sent this case back to Royce Lamberth to solve the violations of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
Royce Lamberth must do what supreme court had requested to do on behalf of supreme court.
Also capital stack is dead at the arrival on Lamberth 's desk.
The future of f and f is up to Lamberth.
Tomorrow
High = $0.57
Close = $0.53