Agree with your statement. Earlier I was too busy with work and shouldn't have posted until I had time to read and digest the information properly.

From today's Tweet the statement "You may have noticed we are promoting our IsoPet division more than ever these days and this is why..." and first paragraph in the meme (for lack of a better term) "Why our IsoPet division is so important...'increases the likelihood of IsoPet becoming a practical solution in the treatment of animal cancer.'" demonstrates that the work is clearly for the IsoPet division which costs more money than it generates and Dr. K hasn't given shareholders any evidence of a plan to make the IsoPet Division profitable. This concerns me and SHOULD concern all shareholders.

The second paragraph of the meme "Additionally, the data obtained at the University of Missouri will support the pre-clinical investigations required by the FDA to provide evidence that RadioGel can be safe and effective for treating various human cancers." confirms that the data from study at U of Missouri is being used towards RadioGel IDE application. What is confusing at best and deliberately misleading at worst is why he inserted this paragraph. The study at U of Missouri was done 2+ years ago and has nothing to do with why they are currently promoting IsoPet division so hard. VERY misleading.

I suppose this is good news if you like a division of a company that, to date, has cost more than the revenue it generates and there is no roadmap to increased revenue, let alone profitability AND you can block out/ignore the misleading U of Missouri paragraph. Personally, I am not a fan of the CEO bragging about a division that looses money. Furthermore, I really hate the fact that he threw (old) 2 year old animal study data for RadioGel onto the Tweet when the focus is clearly on IsoPet work ongoing today. It makes no sense as he could have left off the 2nd paragraph and the Tweet would have been more focused on what is relevant and current - lots of IsoPet work being done by company so it eventually becomes routine care in the treatment of animal cancer.

It is what it is...thank God the FDA is walking us thru the IDE application process as it is all that really matters.

Apologies to the board.

I stand corrected....I didn't properly read it. Thanks for clearing that up for me!

Appreciate the link but that is for a study that was completed a couple years ago. The Tweet indicated a current and ongoing study.

So RDGL pushed out this Tweet today talking about University of Missouri. Since when are animal tests being handled there? We were told about the rabbit testing by Johns Hopkins University which are now complete but this is the 1st I've heard of this.

Did I miss something? If so can someone please share a link? If not, this is concerning to me that we weren't told about this before. What tests are they doing there?

Anyone? Buehler?

You may have noticed we are promoting our IsoPet® division more than ever these days and this is why... #IsoPet #RadioGel #VivosIncUSA #NewGeneration #CancerTreatment #SavingLives #PetCancer $RDGL pic.twitter.com/ljK0705H6W

— Vivos Inc. (@VivosIncUSA) March 13, 2024

I hope you are right

I would say same for you. Even in the pinks the FOMO runs are based on the anticipation of a catalyst. Sadly, for most tickers, the catalyst never happens as fraudulent companies lie to shareholders. Doesn't mean that the pump and dump tickers don't makea few people money...most lose big.

I'm not saying it doesn't impact price...just saying, in general, for vast majority of stocks, social media influence is not nearly as impactful as a catalyst (be it good or bad).

I would love for us to have a Gamestop run...but I am 100% certain that doesn't happen without IDE approval.

Conviction? I've been holding 270,000 shares for 2 years. If that isn't conviction, I don't know what is.

I celebrate good news and I don't celebrate when there isn't good news. That is at odds with many longs who post daily on this board as imo there hasn't been much to cheer about over the last 2 years, let alone on a daily basis. In addition, imo nothing IsoPet related is worthy of celebration. So my posts to counter blind cheerleading posts have been considered as bashing by many here.

I don't mind that as I was trying to bring balance to the board.

None of what you said will impact our share price as much as IDE submission. Once that happens many who are on the sidelines will jump in and simultaneously the news will spread like wildfire.

You can all try to have some effect now, but nothing replaces a huge catalyst.

Never said it wasn't real. It's absolutely what drives stock price explosions. They don't want to miss a catalyst or a catalyst just happened and people are flooding into a ticker.

Fair enough. But I stand by my statement after many years in the OTC. Catalysts and lack of catalysts drive share price....not chatter on boards.

Based on share price and revenue, we should expect a share price of 6 cents or a $12M market cap after financial filing and ticker change...or?

You are conflating 2 different things. What I said is what people post here doesn't change share price. If that were true, all the posts by the cheerleaders over the last 2 years would have us trading at 25 cents now.

What you are talking about is people who see a positive catalyst (like the recent Trademark announcement) and jump into the stock and join the chat boards.

Yes the positive sentiment created by the catalyst is reflected on the chat boards, but the chat boards aren't the reason why new investors flood in. When we submit IDE share price will go up because many people on the sidelines who were watching the stock now see a reason to buy shares. Again, the chatter on the boards does not sway them to buy shares, it is the catalyst. I stand by my logic and reject yours.

Those are 2 VERY different things...now who is clueless?

A 10 figure valuation? He is shooting for the stars!

Don't worry...if we go 3-6 weeks without a positive update the price will drop back to the 6s, maybe 5s. Time will tell...

Pretty sure what we say and/or share on iHub and Twitter doesn't impact stock at all.

What DOES impact share price is lack of news (prce goes down) and good updates from the company like the last Tweet regarding Trademarks (price goes up).

Thanks for the tip...

If only...amazing position you have. You will be a multimillionaire!!

Then I'll wait for that price. Could happen if the filings take long enough

Only guesses...they haven't told us when the next meeting with the FDA will take place.

Sure would be nice if we had a Gamestop run!!! Dreamz

An IDE application is considered approved 30 days after it has been received by the FDA, unless the FDA otherwise informs the sponsor via email prior to 30 calendar days from the date of receipt, that the IDE is approved, approved with conditions, or disapproved.

If you are right.....omg I can only dream you are right!!!

This is VERY refreshing to see share price moving up. Hope we continue!

CLIA waiver could be months or years away...we wouldn't know because AXIM isn't giving CLIA updates.

Most probably thought everything would be filed by now, myself included. I jumped out for a small loss and will buy even more shares at cheaper prices (hopefully). If it goes the way I hope, I get shares at 004 or less and then the share price goes to a dime.

Time will tell and it's all just my 2 cents

Let's see how today goes before we get too hyped up on next...ok? The 20 day on balance volume chart indicator tells me lots of people jumped in, but they all jumped out just as quickly.
If more new people jump in today, that will help share price stay moving in the right direction. Big IF

I am going to scoop up some cheapies...

Disagree - I want to buy at 005 or lower. I am betting this ticker will eventually 10x minimum if not much more based on the CEO's track record. I, for one, am happy to see the delay in the filings and price drop.

The goal is to buy low and sell high - and I believe this downward spiral will reverse soon after the other financial and ticker name change filings.

All imo

It is nice to see some volume!

It is nice to see the share price go up. Trademarks are a positive for a company and shareholders. Let's see how long this lasts.

Sure hope you are right!

"MK has been in charge 8 years and wasted 5 of those years before even talking to FDA about Radiogel human trials in 2021. Then he wasted most of last 3 years resisting FDA suggestions at every turn. Hence why here we are in 2024, and MK has yet to submit a single item FDA suggested years ago. Why? Because IsoPet is his highest priority per his updates and Radiogel is his lowest priority. "

True!!!

It takes time and money to attend vet conferences. Every pet treatment costs the company money it doesn't have. Every penny and minute should be focused on getting IDE submitted. The IDE requires testing and analysis of said testing - this is acceptable and necessary along with anything else necessary to move IDE forward. What isn't (imo) acceptable is a company who generates no revenue spends so much time on an aspect of the business that needlessly wastes that company's resources which are already in very short supply.

I would expect IDE submission and approval will have everyone singing a different tune. I know I will!

Honestly, I lost my patience with this company's focus on IsoPet and seemingly lack of focus on RadioGel months back. I will say this: I know all the frustration will be worth it once they submit the IDE.

Looks like RDGL is taking a page from the cheerleaders playbook and posting how great of a scientist he is on Twitter but even worse they post it with a meme where he is touting IsoPet.
Uggghhh :(

Sad but true...

Your post is all fluff

Not that simple. We are sitting in a potential goldmine with RadioGel. That is where the value is. That is why I am here. And if/when we submit the IDE there are hundreds if not thousands of new investors that will jump in here and send share price on a rocket upwards.

Glad you are happy with all of the IsoPet work being done. As of now, nobody on this board and the company has not shown me 1 single piece of evidence as to why a shareholder should be happy with all the effort being poured into IsoPet.

Some investors can't jump up and down when a money losing aspect of the business seems to take up too much of the company's time.

Again...if anyone can convince me that IsoPet is worthwhile right now, I am all ears.